I’m all for freedom of expression and freedom of association, but shouldn’t a teacher union stay out of hot button issues like abortion when they may have to present a balanced view of abortion in a classroom. I don’t know, it just seems like a silly thing for a teacher union to get involved in, and it rubs me the wrong way.
Teachers’ Union Weighs In on Abortion
Friday, April 23, 2004
WASHINGTON¬ ‚Äî¬ The¬ National Education Association, a 2.7 million member teachers’ union, is a co-sponsor for the pro-abortion rights¬ March for Women’s Lives,¬ angering pro-life educators who say the NEA should stay out of the abortion debate.¬
“I believe the NEA needs to stick to education issues only — in their resolutions, in their decisions, etc.,¬ in what they do as an organization,¬ and completely get out of political issues, including this one here, regarding the woman’s right to choose, the abortion issue, the sanctity of life,” said Connie Bancroft, a member of the pro-life group¬ Teachers Saving Children (search).
While organizers told a news conference this week that the march supports a variety of women’s health issues, the focus was clearly on defeating efforts to limit abortion rights.
The NEA declined an on-camera interview, but said in a statement: “The NEA supports current law. It believes in freedom of choice¬ — for or against abortion. There should be no government limits.”
That said, NEA’s Washington office will be available to members during the event, but a spokesman insists it is not an official hospitality site nor is the national office paying to bus in participants.
In the meantime, the NEA has claimed that a¬ coordinated effort is under way to distort their role in the march this weekend.