Recalling for George McGovern how when he ran for President 32 years ago the Republicans called him “too liberal” and “they’re still accusing the Democratic Party of being too liberal” today, CNN’s Judy Woodruff suggested it was and is an unfair attack as she wanted to know if they’re “going to be able to get away with that argument this year?”
The MRC’s Brian Boyd tracked down the exchange from the 3:30pm EDT half hour of Wednesday’s Inside Politics. Woodruff asked McGovern, who was with her at CNN’s convention floor-side space:
“Senator, when you ran for President, we mentioned 32 years ago, the Republicans were criticizing you and the party of being too liberal. They’re still accusing the Democratic Party of being too liberal. Are they going to be able to get away with that argument this year?”
McGovern: “I don’t think so. John Kerry is a moderate liberal, he’s not way out in either right field or left field.”
Woodruff at least pressed: “Well, they say he’s got the most liberal record in the U.S. Senate.”
McGovern saw that as a good trait: “That’s not too bad. I think if I were in this present Senate, I’d want to be the most liberal member of the Senate…”
Get away with what? Calling McGovern the most liberal man ever to run for the Presidency in modern history a liberal? Horrors!
And John Kerry a moderate? I guess compared to McGovern, everyone is a moderate.
It amazes me, this convention. Prominent interviews and prime time speeches are being given McGovern and by:
Jimmy Carter: Lost his reelection bid in a landslide, destroyed the economy, referred to only as a Nobel Peace Price winner. What relevance does “The Great Malaise” king have to add to any gathering?
Al Sharpton: I think this speaks for itself. The man, in his speech, said that if President Bush were President 54 years ago, Clarence Thomas wouldn’t have been able to go into law school. The man defamed a NYC police officer for “raping” Tuwana Brawley, which never happened. He also was ordered to pay restitution to that police officer. He never has and the media still calls him an “activist.” The FEC has investigated his campaign on numerous occasions and found numerous instances of rule bending. Finally, he never garnered more than 1% of the vote in any primary he ran in. What relevance does he have?
That represents the Democratic party these days.
Just don’t call ‘em liberals because, for whatever reason, those “centrists/progressives/buzzword of the week” folks don’t like it.
Think about that if you want to pull the lever for a donkey this year.