Well, you got what you wanted guys…

I think I was the only one (with maybe the exception of a few other of the Wingnuts who realized that Howard Dean being chair of the DNC was not a good thing.

For all the bravado spewing forth from the mouth of the conservatives in this country, you would think they were waiting for the announcement as proof they had hit some kind of lottery.

Well guys, you got what you wanted. Now take out your calendar. Flip to February 12th, 2005. Okay, are you there? Write this down:

“Today is the day that the DNC regained credibility and moved on from the losing days of Terry McAuliffe, and the RNC is in major trouble. Vincent M. Ferrari 2/12/05″

Got all that? Good. Although, I have a feeling you won’t need reminding that Howard Dean’s election as chair is the turning point of the Democratic Party, and every single one of you who cheered for it like it was the end are all in for one of the rudest awakenings you’ve ever had.

Mark my words..

This entry was posted in In The News. Bookmark the permalink.
  • Patrick

    AGREED.

    I think this does represent a positive shifting point for the DNC. Dean won’t necessarily be the wildly liberal spokesman for a deranged Democratic party that conservatives certainly are hoping for. I wouldn’t be suprised to see his incredible organization and fundraising skills working to create a close and passionate following (something that has helped make Republicans so successful) for the Democratic party much the way he did in his own bid for the Democratic nominaiton.

  • http://www.robertkbrown.com/ RKB

    In order to be successful in anything, you need to have demonstrable passion for said thing. Passion and energy are good things for a lethargic political party.

  • http://www.insignificantthoughts.com Vinny

    Took me a whole post, took you two sentences.

    That’s why you’re a better writer than I am. :mrgreen:

  • http://www.robertkbrown.com/ RKB

    Thanks, Vinny. But you probably know as well as anyone that I can ramble with the best of ‘em.

  • http://site-essential.com Kathy K

    Actually, I hope you are right. We need a viable opposition. Dean’s actually a good bit more moderate in a lot of areas than his supporters are. Might be he will be good for the party.

  • Pingback: Anonymous

  • Patrick

    AGREED.

    I think this does represent a positive shifting point for the DNC. Dean won’t necessarily be the wildly liberal spokesman for a deranged Democratic party that conservatives certainly are hoping for. I wouldn’t be suprised to see his incredible organization and fundraising skills working to create a close and passionate following (something that has helped make Republicans so successful) for the Democratic party much the way he did in his own bid for the Democratic nominaiton.

  • http://www.robertkbrown.com/ RKB

    In order to be successful in anything, you need to have demonstrable passion for said thing. Passion and energy are good things for a lethargic political party.

  • http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/ Vinny

    Took me a whole post, took you two sentences.

    That’s why you’re a better writer than I am. :mrgreen:

  • http://www.robertkbrown.com/ RKB

    Thanks, Vinny. But you probably know as well as anyone that I can ramble with the best of ‘em.

  • http://site-essential.com/ Kathy K

    Actually, I hope you are right. We need a viable opposition. Dean’s actually a good bit more moderate in a lot of areas than his supporters are. Might be he will be good for the party.