Comments on: Today’s Dirty Librarian Chick http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2005/02/27/todays-dirty-librarian-chick/ Specializing in Bovine Fecal Detection Since January of 2002 Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:29:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: balbulican http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2005/02/27/todays-dirty-librarian-chick/#comment-183687 balbulican Tue, 01 Mar 2005 20:29:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/?p=895#comment-183687 No, not at all. We who get it, get it. Emma Peel (the Diana Rigg edition) was WAY too wild to qualify. "Mr. Steed..." indeed. I can think of a few Katherine Hepburn roles that qualify, actually. No, not at all. We who get it, get it. Emma Peel (the Diana Rigg edition) was WAY too wild to qualify. “Mr. Steed…” indeed.

I can think of a few Katherine Hepburn roles that qualify, actually.

]]> By: Vinny http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2005/02/27/todays-dirty-librarian-chick/#comment-183686 Vinny Tue, 01 Mar 2005 20:01:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/?p=895#comment-183686 Yeah, but Emma didn't have the glasses thing going on... I'm having a hell of a time explaining this look :-) Yeah, but Emma didn’t have the glasses thing going on…

I’m having a hell of a time explaining this look :-)

]]> By: RKB http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2005/02/27/todays-dirty-librarian-chick/#comment-183685 RKB Tue, 01 Mar 2005 17:40:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/?p=895#comment-183685 True. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B00005MKOL/102-7923339-1228969?v=glance" rel="nofollow">Emma Peel</a>, for example, wasn't exactly a "librarian," but she was smart, intelligent, and did bring a certain amount of geek cred to the job. That and leather pants. Nothing wrong with that, though. True. Emma Peel, for example, wasn’t exactly a “librarian,” but she was smart, intelligent, and did bring a certain amount of geek cred to the job.

That and leather pants.

Nothing wrong with that, though.

]]> By: balbulican http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2005/02/27/todays-dirty-librarian-chick/#comment-183684 balbulican Tue, 01 Mar 2005 17:01:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/?p=895#comment-183684 The problem you have going too far back is that the notion of "sexy" changes beyond recognition. But of course there's the whole tradition embodied in lines like... "Why. Miss Arbuthnot...without your glasses and with your hair down, you're...beautiful!" The problem you have going too far back is that the notion of “sexy” changes beyond recognition.

But of course there’s the whole tradition embodied in lines like…

“Why. Miss Arbuthnot…without your glasses and with your hair down, you’re…beautiful!”

]]> By: Vinny http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2005/02/27/todays-dirty-librarian-chick/#comment-183683 Vinny Tue, 01 Mar 2005 10:20:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/?p=895#comment-183683 Hmmm... Velma was just geeky, though... Not quite the right look... Hmmm… Velma was just geeky, though… Not quite the right look…

]]> By: RKB http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2005/02/27/todays-dirty-librarian-chick/#comment-183682 RKB Tue, 01 Mar 2005 09:45:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/?p=895#comment-183682 Velma? Velma?

]]> By: Vinny http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2005/02/27/todays-dirty-librarian-chick/#comment-183681 Vinny Tue, 01 Mar 2005 08:03:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/?p=895#comment-183681 Hmmmm... I wonder if we can go back further. That sounds like a fun project :-) Hmmmm… I wonder if we can go back further.

That sounds like a fun project :-)

]]> By: balbulican http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2005/02/27/todays-dirty-librarian-chick/#comment-183680 balbulican Tue, 01 Mar 2005 07:55:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/?p=895#comment-183680 Let's perform a bit of cultural anthropology here and trace this look back in time to its source. As a starting point, I nominate Diane Keaton in the early scenes of "Annie Hall" (1977). Let’s perform a bit of cultural anthropology here and trace this look back in time to its source.

As a starting point, I nominate Diane Keaton in the early scenes of “Annie Hall” (1977).

]]> By: Vinny http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2005/02/27/todays-dirty-librarian-chick/#comment-183679 Vinny Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:10:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/?p=895#comment-183679 Yes, indeed we are. And we love good-lookin' chicks, too :-) Yes, indeed we are. And we love good-lookin’ chicks, too :-)

]]> By: pam http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2005/02/27/todays-dirty-librarian-chick/#comment-183678 pam Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:30:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/?p=895#comment-183678 You guys are incouragable:razz: You guys are incouragable:razz:

]]> By: pam http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2005/02/27/todays-dirty-librarian-chick/#comment-5469 pam Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/?p=895#comment-5469 You guys are incouragable:razz: You guys are incouragable:razz:

]]> By: Vinny http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2005/02/27/todays-dirty-librarian-chick/#comment-5470 Vinny Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/?p=895#comment-5470 Yes, indeed we are. And we love good-lookin' chicks, too :-) Yes, indeed we are. And we love good-lookin’ chicks, too :-)

]]> By: balbulican http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2005/02/27/todays-dirty-librarian-chick/#comment-5471 balbulican Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/?p=895#comment-5471 Let's perform a bit of cultural anthropology here and trace this look back in time to its source. As a starting point, I nominate Diane Keaton in the early scenes of "Annie Hall" (1977). Let’s perform a bit of cultural anthropology here and trace this look back in time to its source.

As a starting point, I nominate Diane Keaton in the early scenes of “Annie Hall” (1977).

]]> By: Vinny http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2005/02/27/todays-dirty-librarian-chick/#comment-5472 Vinny Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/?p=895#comment-5472 Hmmmm... I wonder if we can go back further. That sounds like a fun project :-) Hmmmm… I wonder if we can go back further.

That sounds like a fun project :-)

]]> By: RKB http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2005/02/27/todays-dirty-librarian-chick/#comment-5473 RKB Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/?p=895#comment-5473 Velma? Velma?

]]> By: Vinny http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2005/02/27/todays-dirty-librarian-chick/#comment-5474 Vinny Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/?p=895#comment-5474 Hmmm... Velma was just geeky, though... Not quite the right look... Hmmm… Velma was just geeky, though… Not quite the right look…

]]> By: balbulican http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2005/02/27/todays-dirty-librarian-chick/#comment-5475 balbulican Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/?p=895#comment-5475 The problem you have going too far back is that the notion of "sexy" changes beyond recognition. But of course there's the whole tradition embodied in lines like... "Why. Miss Arbuthnot...without your glasses and with your hair down, you're...beautiful!" The problem you have going too far back is that the notion of “sexy” changes beyond recognition.

But of course there’s the whole tradition embodied in lines like…

“Why. Miss Arbuthnot…without your glasses and with your hair down, you’re…beautiful!”

]]> By: RKB http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2005/02/27/todays-dirty-librarian-chick/#comment-5476 RKB Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/?p=895#comment-5476 True. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B00005MKOL/102-7923339-1228969?v=glance" rel="nofollow">Emma Peel</a>, for example, wasn't exactly a "librarian," but she was smart, intelligent, and did bring a certain amount of geek cred to the job. That and leather pants. Nothing wrong with that, though. True. Emma Peel, for example, wasn’t exactly a “librarian,” but she was smart, intelligent, and did bring a certain amount of geek cred to the job.

That and leather pants.

Nothing wrong with that, though.

]]> By: Vinny http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2005/02/27/todays-dirty-librarian-chick/#comment-5477 Vinny Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/?p=895#comment-5477 Yeah, but Emma didn't have the glasses thing going on... I'm having a hell of a time explaining this look :-) Yeah, but Emma didn’t have the glasses thing going on…

I’m having a hell of a time explaining this look :-)

]]> By: balbulican http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2005/02/27/todays-dirty-librarian-chick/#comment-5478 balbulican Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/?p=895#comment-5478 No, not at all. We who get it, get it. Emma Peel (the Diana Rigg edition) was WAY too wild to qualify. "Mr. Steed..." indeed. I can think of a few Katherine Hepburn roles that qualify, actually. No, not at all. We who get it, get it. Emma Peel (the Diana Rigg edition) was WAY too wild to qualify. “Mr. Steed…” indeed.

I can think of a few Katherine Hepburn roles that qualify, actually.

]]>