<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And so it starts&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2005/04/19/and-so-it-starts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2005/04/19/and-so-it-starts/</link>
	<description>Specializing in Bovine Fecal Detection Since January of 2002</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:29:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinny</title>
		<link>http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2005/04/19/and-so-it-starts/#comment-185025</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 22:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/?p=1153#comment-185025</guid>
		<description>Hey, you&#039;ll get no argument from me that letting Law even speak at the Papal funeral was a disgrace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, you&#8217;ll get no argument from me that letting Law even speak at the Papal funeral was a disgrace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ginger</title>
		<link>http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2005/04/19/and-so-it-starts/#comment-185024</link>
		<dc:creator>Ginger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 22:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/?p=1153#comment-185024</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d have to agree with Pete from Astoria.  Tolerance for sexual abuse was made loud and clear when they allowed Cardinal Law to perform the eulogy at the Pope&#039;s funeral.  It&#039;s mind-boggling -- why would you let a *convicted* sex felon be put on display? It totally says &quot;We&#039;re okay with this guy - regardless of what he&#039;s been convicted of&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d have to agree with Pete from Astoria.  Tolerance for sexual abuse was made loud and clear when they allowed Cardinal Law to perform the eulogy at the Pope&#8217;s funeral.  It&#8217;s mind-boggling &#8212; why would you let a *convicted* sex felon be put on display? It totally says &#8220;We&#8217;re okay with this guy &#8211; regardless of what he&#8217;s been convicted of&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pete from astoria</title>
		<link>http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2005/04/19/and-so-it-starts/#comment-185023</link>
		<dc:creator>pete from astoria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 13:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/?p=1153#comment-185023</guid>
		<description>The way I read it is that Ã¬conservative beliefsÃ® are synonymous with tolerance for sexual abuse. I think I know what theyÃ­re trying to say, but I canÃ­t believe that even the dimwits at UPN 9 News meant it to come out the way it did. Or did they?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way I read it is that Ã¬conservative beliefsÃ® are synonymous with tolerance for sexual abuse. I think I know what theyÃ­re trying to say, but I canÃ­t believe that even the dimwits at UPN 9 News meant it to come out the way it did. Or did they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pete from astoria</title>
		<link>http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2005/04/19/and-so-it-starts/#comment-6765</link>
		<dc:creator>pete from astoria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/?p=1153#comment-6765</guid>
		<description>The way I read it is that Ã¬conservative beliefsÃ® are synonymous with tolerance for sexual abuse. I think I know what theyÃ­re trying to say, but I canÃ­t believe that even the dimwits at UPN 9 News meant it to come out the way it did. Or did they?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way I read it is that Ã¬conservative beliefsÃ® are synonymous with tolerance for sexual abuse. I think I know what theyÃ­re trying to say, but I canÃ­t believe that even the dimwits at UPN 9 News meant it to come out the way it did. Or did they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ginger</title>
		<link>http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2005/04/19/and-so-it-starts/#comment-6766</link>
		<dc:creator>Ginger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/?p=1153#comment-6766</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d have to agree with Pete from Astoria.  Tolerance for sexual abuse was made loud and clear when they allowed Cardinal Law to perform the eulogy at the Pope&#039;s funeral.  It&#039;s mind-boggling -- why would you let a *convicted* sex felon be put on display? It totally says &quot;We&#039;re okay with this guy - regardless of what he&#039;s been convicted of&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d have to agree with Pete from Astoria.  Tolerance for sexual abuse was made loud and clear when they allowed Cardinal Law to perform the eulogy at the Pope&#8217;s funeral.  It&#8217;s mind-boggling &#8212; why would you let a *convicted* sex felon be put on display? It totally says &#8220;We&#8217;re okay with this guy &#8211; regardless of what he&#8217;s been convicted of&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinny</title>
		<link>http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2005/04/19/and-so-it-starts/#comment-6767</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/?p=1153#comment-6767</guid>
		<description>Hey, you&#039;ll get no argument from me that letting Law even speak at the Papal funeral was a disgrace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, you&#8217;ll get no argument from me that letting Law even speak at the Papal funeral was a disgrace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2005/04/19/and-so-it-starts/#comment-6768</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/?p=1153#comment-6768</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;JackLewis.net&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;Round-up: Reaction to Ratzin...er...Benedict&lt;/strong&gt;
Captain&#039;s Quarters, Outside the Beltway, WizBang, ScrappleFace (also here), Blogs for Bush, Tim Blair, Right Wing News, HyScience, Jawa Report,...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>JackLewis.net</strong></p>
<p><strong>Round-up: Reaction to Ratzin&#8230;er&#8230;Benedict</strong><br />
Captain&#8217;s Quarters, Outside the Beltway, WizBang, ScrappleFace (also here), Blogs for Bush, Tim Blair, Right Wing News, HyScience, Jawa Report,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

