Newsweek Officially Retracts Koran Abuse Fabrication

NEW YORK – Newsweek magazine, under fire for a publishing story that led to deadly protests in Afghanistan, said Monday it was retracting its report that a military probe had found evidence of desecration of the Quran by U.S. interrogators at Guantanamo Bay.

Earlier Monday, presidential spokesman Scott McClellan had criticized Newsweek’s initial response to the incident, saying it was “puzzling.”

Newsweek had reported in its issue dated May 9 that U.S. military investigators had found evidence that interrogators placed copies of Islam’s holy book in washrooms and had flushed one down the toilet to get inmates to talk.

Newsweek acknowledged problems with the story and its editor, Mark Whitaker, apologized in an editor’s note in this week’s edition. The accusations spawned protests in Afghanistan that left 15 dead and scores injured.

Whitaker wrote in an editor’s note that “We regret that we got any part of our story wrong, and extend our sympathies to victims of the violence and to the U.S. soldiers caught in its midst.”

Yet again, in their rush to make Bush look bad, they rushed a story to press and it’s so shaky they can’t stand behind it.

Good thing they have all those standards and fact-checkers working for them.

Source: Yahoo

This entry was posted in Interesting. Bookmark the permalink.
  • Patrick

    I’ve recently decided that I should stay out of the ever ubiquitous debate concerning media bias but alas, a little clarity is needed…

    Newsweek recently printed a glowing review of Anne Coulter’s career. I suggest you take a look at the issue before alleging a liberal bias.

  • http://www.insignificantthoughts.com Vinny

    Hmmmm… I think you mean Time, and if you do, I have that issue and it was hardly glowing.

  • Patrick

    okay….you were right. Time it is.

    oops!

    You say it was critical, I say it was glowing. This is why I stay out of the debate.

  • http://www.dogsnot.net gordon the magnificent

    Oh man! That was funny!

  • http://www.insignificantthoughts.com Vinny

    The writer took every opportunity to get a disclaimer in about what “other people” thought of Ann, and made sure to paint the proper caricature of her based on other people’s opinions.

    He spent the whole article slinging insults at Ann under the veil of “other people are saying Ann…”

    Sorry, but that’s not my definition of glowing.

  • Patrick

    “Other people are saying Ann…”

    Go on. Finish the quote.

  • Patrick

    I’ve recently decided that I should stay out of the ever ubiquitous debate concerning media bias but alas, a little clarity is needed…

    Newsweek recently printed a glowing review of Anne Coulter’s career. I suggest you take a look at the issue before alleging a liberal bias.

  • Patrick

    I’ve recently decided that I should stay out of the ever ubiquitous debate concerning media bias but alas, a little clarity is needed…

    Newsweek recently printed a glowing review of Anne Coulter’s career. I suggest you take a look at the issue before alleging a liberal bias.

  • Patrick

    I’ve recently decided that I should stay out of the ever ubiquitous debate concerning media bias but alas, a little clarity is needed…

    Newsweek recently printed a glowing review of Anne Coulter’s career. I suggest you take a look at the issue before alleging a liberal bias.

  • http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/ Vinny

    Hmmmm… I think you mean Time, and if you do, I have that issue and it was hardly glowing.

  • Patrick

    okay….you were right. Time it is.

    oops!

    You say it was critical, I say it was glowing. This is why I stay out of the debate.

  • Patrick

    okay….you were right. Time it is.

    oops!

    You say it was critical, I say it was glowing. This is why I stay out of the debate.

  • Patrick

    okay….you were right. Time it is.

    oops!

    You say it was critical, I say it was glowing. This is why I stay out of the debate.

  • Patrick

    okay….you were right. Time it is.

    oops!

    You say it was critical, I say it was glowing. This is why I stay out of the debate.

  • Patrick

    okay….you were right. Time it is.

    oops!

    You say it was critical, I say it was glowing. This is why I stay out of the debate.

  • Patrick

    okay….you were right. Time it is.

    oops!

    You say it was critical, I say it was glowing. This is why I stay out of the debate.

  • http://www.dogsnot.net/ gordon the magnificent

    Oh man! That was funny!

  • http://www.dogsnot.net/ gordon the magnificent

    Oh man! That was funny!

  • http://www.dogsnot.net/ gordon the magnificent

    Oh man! That was funny!

  • http://www.dogsnot.net/ gordon the magnificent

    Oh man! That was funny!

  • http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/ Vinny

    The writer took every opportunity to get a disclaimer in about what “other people” thought of Ann, and made sure to paint the proper caricature of her based on other people’s opinions.

    He spent the whole article slinging insults at Ann under the veil of “other people are saying Ann…”

    Sorry, but that’s not my definition of glowing.

  • http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/ Vinny

    The writer took every opportunity to get a disclaimer in about what “other people” thought of Ann, and made sure to paint the proper caricature of her based on other people’s opinions.

    He spent the whole article slinging insults at Ann under the veil of “other people are saying Ann…”

    Sorry, but that’s not my definition of glowing.

  • Patrick

    “Other people are saying Ann…”

    Go on. Finish the quote.

  • Patrick

    “Other people are saying Ann…”

    Go on. Finish the quote.