Oct 19 2005
Hmmmm… How strange…
Does anyone else find it convenient that the media has forgotten about the wackjob, Cindy Sheehan?
I mean, she was the dimpled darling of the american left for months and months, and people were falling all over themselves to hear what she had to say.
Suddenly nobody cares about her anymore…
Could it have something to do with who she’s criticizing these days?
Sheehan thrashing ‘war hawk’ Hillary
Cindy tears into Clinton for Iraq support, compares her to radio’s Rush Limbaugh
Posted: October 19, 2005
2:15 p.m. EasternBy Joe Kovacs
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.comCindy Sheehan, the so-called “peace mom” on a crusade to end U.S. involvement in the Iraq war, is publicly blasting Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., for her continued support of the ongoing conflict.
“I think she is a political animal who believes she has to be a war hawk to keep up with the big boys,” Sheehan writes in an open letter posted on anti-Bush filmmaker Michael Moore’s website. “I would love to support Hillary for president if she would come out against the travesty in Iraq. But I don’t think she can speak out against the occupation, because she supports it. I will not make the mistake of supporting another pro-war Democrat for president again: As I won’t support a pro-war Republican.”
“I believe that the intelligent thing for Democrats to do for 2006 and 2008 would be to come out strongly and correctly against the botched, bungled, illegal, and immoral occupation of Iraq,” Sheehan added.
Hmmmm… Got very little mention. No, check that. This got no mention at all today.
Isn’t it odd that every move this woman used to make was televised for the world to see, and now all of a sudden she isn’t worth writing about? There’s gotta be a reason… Guess her target selection offended someone.
October 20th, 2005 at 2:27 am
I actually thought she pretty much dropped off the media radar at the end of the summer. Once Bush returned back to DC, it was all Katrina all the time. Between Katrina, Rita, and now Wilma, there’s little room for Cindy.
October 20th, 2005 at 7:42 am
Not in New York it wasn’t; not by a longshot, and I reckon it was the same for most of the rest of the country.
October 20th, 2005 at 9:56 am
I figured she got the point when she didn’t get the support that those paying her had hoped for. I think this move to attack Hillary was calculated. Attack Hillary for attention. I don’t think many are talking about her at this point because she is the puppet/nut case many of us thought she was. I don’t think this really has anything to do with the MSM protecting Hillary.