Jan 30 2007

We Support Our Troops By Spitting At Them

Posted at 12:10 pm under War in Iraq

I guess we can drop the whole “we support the troops, not the war” bullshit.

In Washington, counterprotesters also converged on the mall in smaller numbers, but the antiwar demonstration was largely peaceful.

There were a few tense moments, however, including an encounter involving Joshua Sparling, 25, who was on crutches and who said he was a corporal with the 82nd Airborne Division and lost his right leg below the knee in Ramadi, Iraq. Mr. Sparling spoke at a smaller rally held earlier in the day at the United States Navy Memorial, and voiced his support for the administration’s policies in Iraq.

Later, as antiwar protesters passed where he and his group were standing, words were exchanged and one of the antiwar protestors spit at the ground near Mr. Sparling; he spit back.

Capitol police made the antiwar protestors walk farther away from the counterprotesters.

“These are not Americans as far as I’m concerned,” Mr. Sparling said.

Look, I’m no happier with the war than anyone else. Frankly, I think it’s become a mismanaged mess combined with a stubbornness contest run by a man who once thought staying the course meant never changing and who later came on and said the plan was never to stay the course.

A mess. A disaster. A mismanaged clusterf**k.

That being said, I still don’t think anyone mislead the country and I certainly don’t think anyone was “fooled, tricked, or lied to.” I think we were wrong. Plain and simple. I also think that because the President has tried so hard to fight a soft mushy nicey nice war (shock and awe my ass), he didn’t get the job done when it could’ve been months ago. He didn’t go in strong enough to the areas where people like Muqtada al Sadar were running the show and take people like him out.

Bad move.

He also didn’t pressure his generals or the Iraqi government to get their people to take control quicker. It almost seems that if we leave at any point, that country will fall into even worse chaos than it’s in now.

All that taken as a package, I still don’t blame our troops for it. Spitting at our troops and calling them babykillers, etc., does nothing to solve the problem that exists in Iraq or the question of how we can, at some point somewhere, make a strategic exit (you have to leave at some point unless you plan on making Iraq the 51st state, folks; be realistic).

Frankly, spitting on the troops is more of a gesture of F*** You and disrespect than anything else.

You wanna debate policy? Let’s! Please! Let’s have this discussion you guys are so anxious to have. I’d love to have people come up with real solutions to the problem we face in Iraq. I’d welcome a dose of thought rather than a cup of rhetoric from both sides.

Spitting is not a discussion, and the people doing it to our returning troops (particularly those who lost a limb) are not worth talking to to begin with because, quite frankly, I don’t think a debate is what they want.

Stop chanting “Bring our troops home!” if this is what you’re going to do to them when they get here.

Story quoted from Wizbang and my favorite conservative writer, Kim Priestap

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

5 Responses to “We Support Our Troops By Spitting At Them”

  1. Bridget Says:

    Yes, our troops are obviously baby killers - here’s the proof - http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2007/01/25/truthwe-do-care/

    we’ll go ahead and ignore the facts that it was insurgents that shot this baby in the head and executed her entire family. we are the ones that are responsible.
    /sarcasm off

  2. Patrick Says:

    “That being said, I still don’t think anyone mislead the country and I certainly don’t think anyone was “fooled, tricked, or lied to.” ”

    …Even though there exists an amazing amount of evidence which points to the contrary.

    Why didn’t the President and his administration consult with any of the multitude of intelligence experts and leading mid-east scholars who disagreed with the “evidence” that was used to support this war?

    If you take a look at the number of CIA and DOD resignations near the beggining of the war you begin to see how they chose to “quiet” those who dissagreed with the a war in Iraq.

    I get all fired up when I think about the way our government (congress too, but not so much as the President) has failed us.

    I have an incredibly difficult time understanding how anyone could currently support this President. Worst President ever? Currently, all signs point to yes.

  3. Vinny Says:

    Evidence?

    Funny… I’ve seen evidence of errors in judgment, but one piece of outright lying. Maybe you’ve seen different “evidence?”

    By the way, this is exactly what I was talking about. The subject at hand is what do we do, not what did we do. It’s an important distinction.

  4. Conrad Says:

    Although I am not a fan of our current president or the war he so needed to foist upon us. I do support our troops and agree that it is completely disrespectful to spit at and call them names regardless of their politics or standing on this war. It is blatantly hypocritical to be a part of a protest to bring said troops home while acting in such a vile manner to those who have served.

  5. Patrick Says:

    Agreed. We do need to focus on a solution to the Iraq debacle. However, the way this war was sold should’t be disregarded. The deceipt (blatant or subtle) and the outright ineptitude says much about the flaws in our political system.

    By the way…deceipt? What about Nigerian yellowcake? In my book, whenever someone tries so viciously to quiet their critics (see Valerie Plame) that person generally has something to hide. Evidence or not, the signs are obvious. It’s just common sense…

Leave a comment