Comments on: Clinton Outraises Obama, Leads Polls http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2007/10/04/clinton-outraises-obama-leads-polls/ Specializing in Bovine Fecal Detection Since January of 2002 Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:29:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: insignificant thoughts » Information Salad #60: The Something Out Of Nothing Edition http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2007/10/04/clinton-outraises-obama-leads-polls/#comment-21574 insignificant thoughts » Information Salad #60: The Something Out Of Nothing Edition Sat, 06 Oct 2007 14:01:28 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2007/10/04/clinton-outraises-obama-leads-polls/#comment-21574 [...] Vinny hopes we never become an Obama-Nation [...] [...] Vinny hopes we never become an Obama-Nation [...]

]]> By: trish http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2007/10/04/clinton-outraises-obama-leads-polls/#comment-21565 trish Sat, 06 Oct 2007 09:48:52 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2007/10/04/clinton-outraises-obama-leads-polls/#comment-21565 Bob, really, "colored people?" Are you my grandfather? LOL Bob, really, “colored people?” Are you my grandfather? LOL

]]> By: trish http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2007/10/04/clinton-outraises-obama-leads-polls/#comment-192511 trish Sat, 06 Oct 2007 09:48:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2007/10/04/clinton-outraises-obama-leads-polls/#comment-192511 Bob, really, "colored people?" Are you my grandfather? LOL Bob, really, “colored people?” Are you my grandfather? LOL

]]> By: Information Salad #60: The Something Out Of Nothing Edition : ISPN Media http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2007/10/04/clinton-outraises-obama-leads-polls/#comment-21558 Information Salad #60: The Something Out Of Nothing Edition : ISPN Media Sat, 06 Oct 2007 05:36:15 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2007/10/04/clinton-outraises-obama-leads-polls/#comment-21558 [...] Vinny hopes we never become an Obama-Nation [...] [...] Vinny hopes we never become an Obama-Nation [...]

]]> By: Vidiot http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2007/10/04/clinton-outraises-obama-leads-polls/#comment-21518 Vidiot Fri, 05 Oct 2007 06:33:34 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2007/10/04/clinton-outraises-obama-leads-polls/#comment-21518 I don't have a dog in the fight (as I haven't made up my mind who to support yet), but Obama released his health care plan, in detail, on May 29...several months before Hillary released hers. I don’t have a dog in the fight (as I haven’t made up my mind who to support yet), but Obama released his health care plan, in detail, on May 29…several months before Hillary released hers.

]]> By: Vidiot http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2007/10/04/clinton-outraises-obama-leads-polls/#comment-192510 Vidiot Fri, 05 Oct 2007 06:33:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2007/10/04/clinton-outraises-obama-leads-polls/#comment-192510 I don't have a dog in the fight (as I haven't made up my mind who to support yet), but Obama released his health care plan, in detail, on May 29...several months before Hillary released hers. I don’t have a dog in the fight (as I haven’t made up my mind who to support yet), but Obama released his health care plan, in detail, on May 29…several months before Hillary released hers.

]]> By: Vinny http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2007/10/04/clinton-outraises-obama-leads-polls/#comment-21499 Vinny Thu, 04 Oct 2007 21:32:16 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2007/10/04/clinton-outraises-obama-leads-polls/#comment-21499 I have no idea either. Truth is likely voters always end up voting and you can never predict what unlikely voters will do, but it wouldn't surprise me if we suddenly see a rush of votes in both directions as the elections draw near. Once the primaries are over, I think it'll all be moot anyway. As much as Barack may pick up a few undecideds, you can probably expect Hillary to do the same. I have no idea either. Truth is likely voters always end up voting and you can never predict what unlikely voters will do, but it wouldn’t surprise me if we suddenly see a rush of votes in both directions as the elections draw near. Once the primaries are over, I think it’ll all be moot anyway. As much as Barack may pick up a few undecideds, you can probably expect Hillary to do the same.

]]> By: Vinny http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2007/10/04/clinton-outraises-obama-leads-polls/#comment-192509 Vinny Thu, 04 Oct 2007 21:32:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2007/10/04/clinton-outraises-obama-leads-polls/#comment-192509 I have no idea either. Truth is likely voters always end up voting and you can never predict what unlikely voters will do, but it wouldn't surprise me if we suddenly see a rush of votes in both directions as the elections draw near. Once the primaries are over, I think it'll all be moot anyway. As much as Barack may pick up a few undecideds, you can probably expect Hillary to do the same. I have no idea either. Truth is likely voters always end up voting and you can never predict what unlikely voters will do, but it wouldn’t surprise me if we suddenly see a rush of votes in both directions as the elections draw near. Once the primaries are over, I think it’ll all be moot anyway. As much as Barack may pick up a few undecideds, you can probably expect Hillary to do the same.

]]> By: Bob http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2007/10/04/clinton-outraises-obama-leads-polls/#comment-21495 Bob Thu, 04 Oct 2007 19:23:19 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2007/10/04/clinton-outraises-obama-leads-polls/#comment-21495 Curious what you think about this: All of the polls I've seen place Clinton ahead of Obama ahead of Edwards... but these are always polls of "likely voters". It seems to me that a whole lot of "unlikely voters" - namely, sizable portions of all minorities - will be turning out in droves to vote for Obama. These voters are missed by pollsters because they have never voted before and are generally unlikely to vote. I just cannot imagine a lot colored people NOT voting for Obama. The "first black president"? That's one hell of an unstated Call to Vote. Granted, voting in primaries is different than voting in national elections (turn out is lower, only the hard core actually do it, etc.), so this may allow Hill to win the nomination, in which case she'll grab Obama as her VP. Anyway, curious what you think, and even more curious what will happen; I really have no idea! At this point, the fact that Edwards is NOT going win the nomination (and won't be a VP candidate after the '04 catastrophe), makes me eager, instead of anxious, to see who the Dems put forward. And of course I am still waiting for an interesting Republican candidate. Curious what you think about this:

All of the polls I’ve seen place Clinton ahead of Obama ahead of Edwards… but these are always polls of “likely voters”. It seems to me that a whole lot of “unlikely voters” – namely, sizable portions of all minorities – will be turning out in droves to vote for Obama. These voters are missed by pollsters because they have never voted before and are generally unlikely to vote.

I just cannot imagine a lot colored people NOT voting for Obama. The “first black president”? That’s one hell of an unstated Call to Vote. Granted, voting in primaries is different than voting in national elections (turn out is lower, only the hard core actually do it, etc.), so this may allow Hill to win the nomination, in which case she’ll grab Obama as her VP.

Anyway, curious what you think, and even more curious what will happen; I really have no idea!

At this point, the fact that Edwards is NOT going win the nomination (and won’t be a VP candidate after the ’04 catastrophe), makes me eager, instead of anxious, to see who the Dems put forward. And of course I am still waiting for an interesting Republican candidate.

]]> By: Bob http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2007/10/04/clinton-outraises-obama-leads-polls/#comment-192508 Bob Thu, 04 Oct 2007 19:23:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2007/10/04/clinton-outraises-obama-leads-polls/#comment-192508 Curious what you think about this: All of the polls I've seen place Clinton ahead of Obama ahead of Edwards... but these are always polls of "likely voters". It seems to me that a whole lot of "unlikely voters" - namely, sizable portions of all minorities - will be turning out in droves to vote for Obama. These voters are missed by pollsters because they have never voted before and are generally unlikely to vote. I just cannot imagine a lot colored people NOT voting for Obama. The "first black president"? That's one hell of an unstated Call to Vote. Granted, voting in primaries is different than voting in national elections (turn out is lower, only the hard core actually do it, etc.), so this may allow Hill to win the nomination, in which case she'll grab Obama as her VP. Anyway, curious what you think, and even more curious what will happen; I really have no idea! At this point, the fact that Edwards is NOT going win the nomination (and won't be a VP candidate after the '04 catastrophe), makes me eager, instead of anxious, to see who the Dems put forward. And of course I am still waiting for an interesting Republican candidate. Curious what you think about this:

All of the polls I’ve seen place Clinton ahead of Obama ahead of Edwards… but these are always polls of “likely voters”. It seems to me that a whole lot of “unlikely voters” – namely, sizable portions of all minorities – will be turning out in droves to vote for Obama. These voters are missed by pollsters because they have never voted before and are generally unlikely to vote.

I just cannot imagine a lot colored people NOT voting for Obama. The “first black president”? That’s one hell of an unstated Call to Vote. Granted, voting in primaries is different than voting in national elections (turn out is lower, only the hard core actually do it, etc.), so this may allow Hill to win the nomination, in which case she’ll grab Obama as her VP.

Anyway, curious what you think, and even more curious what will happen; I really have no idea!

At this point, the fact that Edwards is NOT going win the nomination (and won’t be a VP candidate after the ’04 catastrophe), makes me eager, instead of anxious, to see who the Dems put forward. And of course I am still waiting for an interesting Republican candidate.

]]> By: Vinny http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2007/10/04/clinton-outraises-obama-leads-polls/#comment-21488 Vinny Thu, 04 Oct 2007 16:56:11 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2007/10/04/clinton-outraises-obama-leads-polls/#comment-21488 The first time I saw it was this morning, but I can assure you I did exactly the same thing. The first time I saw it was this morning, but I can assure you I did exactly the same thing.

]]> By: Vinny http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2007/10/04/clinton-outraises-obama-leads-polls/#comment-192507 Vinny Thu, 04 Oct 2007 16:56:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2007/10/04/clinton-outraises-obama-leads-polls/#comment-192507 The first time I saw it was this morning, but I can assure you I did exactly the same thing. The first time I saw it was this morning, but I can assure you I did exactly the same thing.

]]> By: trish http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2007/10/04/clinton-outraises-obama-leads-polls/#comment-21486 trish Thu, 04 Oct 2007 16:36:46 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2007/10/04/clinton-outraises-obama-leads-polls/#comment-21486 I stood up and cheered when I saw that poll on the news last night. I stood up and cheered when I saw that poll on the news last night.

]]> By: trish http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2007/10/04/clinton-outraises-obama-leads-polls/#comment-192506 trish Thu, 04 Oct 2007 16:36:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2007/10/04/clinton-outraises-obama-leads-polls/#comment-192506 I stood up and cheered when I saw that poll on the news last night. I stood up and cheered when I saw that poll on the news last night.

]]>