If this moron doesn’t epitomize the kind of vapid idiots that swoon over the clean articulate black candidate (Joe Biden’s words, not mine) I don’t know what does. Gothamist has an interview with Eugene Mirman who, they claim, is a comic. I guess I have no right to argue his occupation, although he’s apparently not a very good one because I’m really into stand up and I’ve never heard of him. Anyway, here are his answers to two questions about the upcoming elections:
Who’s your least favorite Democratic nominee and why? Hillary? I went to a rally of hers in New Hampshire and it was kind of annoying and uninspiring. Though she’s working hard on re-branding herself, so maybe in a month we’ll think we’ve loved her all along?
I’m sure Hillary is smart and would do a pretty good job with policy. I think the problem with her is that when she’s saying what she believes deep down, she feels like she’s lying. But that might be because she’s had to develop a harsh exterior to get to where she has. That’s what Charles Bronson did. However, at least it’s better than Bush, who I’m pretty sure is actually trying to hatch an evil plan. I bet his last words as president will be, “Suckers!” and then he’ll blow up the Statue of Liberty and disappear in a submarine.
Nothing to say except for emtpy rhetorical criticism. But wait, it gets better…
Why Obama? I’d like to apologize in advance for answering this question sincerely. I want two things from a president: 1) an effective, visionary leader with the ability to make America and the world better (i.e. better schools, less enemies, more cash to buy health care and whiskey, etc.) and 2) someone who embodies my ideals (which are great ideals, trust me), and is a gifted, intelligent speaker, who doesn’t seem sneaky and you’re not embarrassed or infuriated when they’re on television.
To me, Obama is those things — he’s smart, inspiring, far less divisive, he compromises to get things done. His opponents (in Illinois) describe him as “reasonable.” I like that. Though he’s passionate, he doesn’t seem ideologically dogmatic, but more a judicious problem solver. He’s fiscally responsible, socially progressive, and a moderate of sorts. Plus, sometimes, he speaks with such force he makes reporters cry. He’s the most inspiring candidate in years. He’s spun as not having enough experience, but he’s actually worked for two decades in public service – regardless, I believe experience is something that is easier gained than wisdom. (George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and Ted Nugent being the proof of that). For me, voting for Obama feels like I’m voting for someone, not against another. Ultimately, I guess I like and believe him more than the rest. Maybe he studied with Stanislavski? And Hillary studied kabuki?
Barack Obama is an “effective, visionary leader with the ability to make America and the world better?”
Based on what?
Well, the good news for Eugene is that he’ll never have to explain that because when you say vague flattering things about Obama even if they’re completely sans substance, they’re believed and are not to be questioned. Notice, he has absolutely nothing to say about actual hard policy or experience with regards to Obama. Much like most of his supporters, he buys into the “idea” of Obama and knows nothing about the actual candidate.
At least the primaries and caucuses are proving that people who actually vote aren’t as devoid of thought as the people who talk about who they’re going to vote for.
