What Freedom Of Speech REALLY Means
| insignificant thoughts |
| kthxbai |
About Me:
Recent Comments
- All of you need to stop bashing Obama… He is simpl...
- Hey- check out a NEW Eye-Opening Documentary about...
- Without upstanding folks like you helping little f...
- I actually own the comfort wipe and I have nothing...
- This MUST be a joke.
Blogroll
Archives
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
Disclaimer
July 11th, 2008 at 4:06 pm
Excellent coverage of the the 1st Amendment. The Clear and Present Danger test (ie, not yelling fire in a crowded theater) has been used wrongly for a long time now. The purpose of that test is *NOT* to protect people from offensive speech, but instead to protect people from speech that may cause them actual physical or material harm. As Constitutional tests go, it’s one of the better ones, yet somehow, people seem to be able to find wiggle room in it when in fact there is none.
One of the things I believe is that everyone has the right to their truth, no matter how wrong it is. If I don’t want to hear your truth, I can simply ignore you. Generally, I don’t ignore anyone, because someone else’s truth might contain a kernel of usefulness or a bit of necessary knowledge, no matter how wrong or how sick or how twisted their truth might be.
Even inflammatory speech might contain something of value, even if that value is the message “stay away from me, I’m a bigot, I’m a moron, and I’m unreasonable.”
Oh, and when it comes to unpopular speech: The FCC are the fascists of speech and they should lose the power to regulate the airwaves. They are without reason and intellect. I don’t like, for example, Howard Stern, but I don’t think he should have to move to a Satellite network to prevent the FCC from fining him. You can turn on BET or MTV and watch people engaging in actions he only spoke about. *sigh*
July 11th, 2008 at 7:17 pm
So, what is your take on libel laws?
July 13th, 2008 at 12:45 pm
That’s a good question… I guess you couldn’t take those away, could you?
I think I was more focused on what you have the right to say and people’s right to not be offended, but I should’ve taken that into consideration.
July 15th, 2008 at 1:13 pm
I think that you and I would probably agree on this one, though, upon further consideration, this turns out to be a rather complicated issue.
The Clear and Present Danger clause was also intended as a safe guard against revolt and disorder; to protect the status quo. Is this a good thing? Don’t get me wrong, I don’t support an overthrow of the government, but isn’t this despotism?
July 15th, 2008 at 1:20 pm
Sure sounds like it. The C&PD clause was a bad idea because it has come to mean anything that can harm a person’s psyche, etc. As with most Supreme Court decisions, it’s twisted in ways it was never intended to be to back up the assertion that words hurt.
Not good.
July 15th, 2008 at 4:56 pm
In reality, life might not be so much fun if there existed pure and complete freedom of speech. The C&PD clause has some valid points, but you’re right, it has been misconstrued.
I don’t know that I would want to live in a country that didn’t enforce some sort of speech regulation, but I’d like that regulation to be as little as possible.
August 17th, 2008 at 7:19 pm
hmm.. says there is a problem loading this video..
should I check back, or is there somewhere else to see it?
Thanks.
August 17th, 2008 at 7:22 pm
Jeff: Try here:
Click