Comments on: What Freedom Of Speech REALLY Means http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/ Specializing in Bovine Fecal Detection Since January of 2002 Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:29:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Vinny http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-84935 Vinny Sun, 17 Aug 2008 23:22:49 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-84935 Jeff: Try here: <a href="http://www.viddler.com/explore/vincenzof/videos/9/">Click</a> Jeff: Try here:

Click

]]> By: Vinny http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-193281 Vinny Sun, 17 Aug 2008 23:22:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-193281 Jeff: Try here: <a href="http://www.viddler.com/explore/vincenzof/videos/9/" rel="nofollow">Click</a> Jeff: Try here:

Click

]]> By: Vinny http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-193282 Vinny Sun, 17 Aug 2008 23:22:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-193282 Jeff: Try here: <a href="http://www.viddler.com/explore/vincenzof/videos/9/" rel="nofollow">Click</a> Jeff: Try here:

Click

]]> By: Jeff http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-84934 Jeff Sun, 17 Aug 2008 23:19:14 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-84934 hmm.. says there is a problem loading this video.. should I check back, or is there somewhere else to see it? Thanks. hmm.. says there is a problem loading this video..

should I check back, or is there somewhere else to see it?

Thanks.

]]> By: Jeff http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-193279 Jeff Sun, 17 Aug 2008 23:19:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-193279 hmm.. says there is a problem loading this video.. should I check back, or is there somewhere else to see it? Thanks. hmm.. says there is a problem loading this video..

should I check back, or is there somewhere else to see it?

Thanks.

]]> By: Jeff http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-193280 Jeff Sun, 17 Aug 2008 23:19:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-193280 hmm.. says there is a problem loading this video.. should I check back, or is there somewhere else to see it? Thanks. hmm.. says there is a problem loading this video..

should I check back, or is there somewhere else to see it?

Thanks.

]]> By: Patrick http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-79096 Patrick Tue, 15 Jul 2008 20:56:15 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-79096 In reality, life might not be so much fun if there existed pure and complete freedom of speech. The C&PD clause has some valid points, but you're right, it has been misconstrued. I don't know that I would want to live in a country that didn't enforce some sort of speech regulation, but I'd like that regulation to be as little as possible. In reality, life might not be so much fun if there existed pure and complete freedom of speech. The C&PD clause has some valid points, but you’re right, it has been misconstrued.

I don’t know that I would want to live in a country that didn’t enforce some sort of speech regulation, but I’d like that regulation to be as little as possible.

]]> By: Patrick http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-193278 Patrick Tue, 15 Jul 2008 20:56:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-193278 In reality, life might not be so much fun if there existed pure and complete freedom of speech. The C&PD clause has some valid points, but you're right, it has been misconstrued. I don't know that I would want to live in a country that didn't enforce some sort of speech regulation, but I'd like that regulation to be as little as possible. In reality, life might not be so much fun if there existed pure and complete freedom of speech. The C&PD clause has some valid points, but you’re right, it has been misconstrued.

I don’t know that I would want to live in a country that didn’t enforce some sort of speech regulation, but I’d like that regulation to be as little as possible.

]]> By: Vinny http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-79039 Vinny Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:20:44 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-79039 Sure sounds like it. The C&PD clause was a bad idea because it has come to mean anything that can harm a person's psyche, etc. As with most Supreme Court decisions, it's twisted in ways it was never intended to be to back up the assertion that words hurt. Not good. Sure sounds like it. The C&PD clause was a bad idea because it has come to mean anything that can harm a person’s psyche, etc. As with most Supreme Court decisions, it’s twisted in ways it was never intended to be to back up the assertion that words hurt.

Not good.

]]> By: Vinny http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-193276 Vinny Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:20:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-193276 Sure sounds like it. The C&PD; clause was a bad idea because it has come to mean anything that can harm a person's psyche, etc. As with most Supreme Court decisions, it's twisted in ways it was never intended to be to back up the assertion that words hurt. Not good. Sure sounds like it. The C&PD; clause was a bad idea because it has come to mean anything that can harm a person’s psyche, etc. As with most Supreme Court decisions, it’s twisted in ways it was never intended to be to back up the assertion that words hurt.

Not good.

]]> By: Vinny http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-193277 Vinny Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:20:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-193277 Sure sounds like it. The C&PD; clause was a bad idea because it has come to mean anything that can harm a person's psyche, etc. As with most Supreme Court decisions, it's twisted in ways it was never intended to be to back up the assertion that words hurt. Not good. Sure sounds like it. The C&PD; clause was a bad idea because it has come to mean anything that can harm a person’s psyche, etc. As with most Supreme Court decisions, it’s twisted in ways it was never intended to be to back up the assertion that words hurt.

Not good.

]]> By: Patrick http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-79037 Patrick Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:13:09 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-79037 I think that you and I would probably agree on this one, though, upon further consideration, this turns out to be a rather complicated issue. The Clear and Present Danger clause was also intended as a safe guard against revolt and disorder; to protect the status quo. Is this a good thing? Don't get me wrong, I don't support an overthrow of the government, but isn't this despotism? I think that you and I would probably agree on this one, though, upon further consideration, this turns out to be a rather complicated issue.

The Clear and Present Danger clause was also intended as a safe guard against revolt and disorder; to protect the status quo. Is this a good thing? Don’t get me wrong, I don’t support an overthrow of the government, but isn’t this despotism?

]]> By: Patrick http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-193274 Patrick Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:13:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-193274 I think that you and I would probably agree on this one, though, upon further consideration, this turns out to be a rather complicated issue. The Clear and Present Danger clause was also intended as a safe guard against revolt and disorder; to protect the status quo. Is this a good thing? Don't get me wrong, I don't support an overthrow of the government, but isn't this despotism? I think that you and I would probably agree on this one, though, upon further consideration, this turns out to be a rather complicated issue.

The Clear and Present Danger clause was also intended as a safe guard against revolt and disorder; to protect the status quo. Is this a good thing? Don’t get me wrong, I don’t support an overthrow of the government, but isn’t this despotism?

]]> By: Patrick http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-193275 Patrick Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:13:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-193275 I think that you and I would probably agree on this one, though, upon further consideration, this turns out to be a rather complicated issue. The Clear and Present Danger clause was also intended as a safe guard against revolt and disorder; to protect the status quo. Is this a good thing? Don't get me wrong, I don't support an overthrow of the government, but isn't this despotism? I think that you and I would probably agree on this one, though, upon further consideration, this turns out to be a rather complicated issue.

The Clear and Present Danger clause was also intended as a safe guard against revolt and disorder; to protect the status quo. Is this a good thing? Don’t get me wrong, I don’t support an overthrow of the government, but isn’t this despotism?

]]> By: Vinny http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-78466 Vinny Sun, 13 Jul 2008 16:45:47 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-78466 That's a good question... I guess you couldn't take those away, could you? I think I was more focused on what you have the right to say and people's right to not be offended, but I should've taken that into consideration. That’s a good question… I guess you couldn’t take those away, could you?

I think I was more focused on what you have the right to say and people’s right to not be offended, but I should’ve taken that into consideration.

]]> By: Vinny http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-193272 Vinny Sun, 13 Jul 2008 16:45:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-193272 That's a good question... I guess you couldn't take those away, could you? I think I was more focused on what you have the right to say and people's right to not be offended, but I should've taken that into consideration. That’s a good question… I guess you couldn’t take those away, could you?

I think I was more focused on what you have the right to say and people’s right to not be offended, but I should’ve taken that into consideration.

]]> By: Vinny http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-193273 Vinny Sun, 13 Jul 2008 16:45:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-193273 That's a good question... I guess you couldn't take those away, could you? I think I was more focused on what you have the right to say and people's right to not be offended, but I should've taken that into consideration. That’s a good question… I guess you couldn’t take those away, could you?

I think I was more focused on what you have the right to say and people’s right to not be offended, but I should’ve taken that into consideration.

]]> By: Patrick http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-78049 Patrick Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:17:21 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-78049 So, what is your take on libel laws? So, what is your take on libel laws?

]]> By: Patrick http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-193270 Patrick Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:17:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-193270 So, what is your take on libel laws? So, what is your take on libel laws?

]]> By: Patrick http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-193271 Patrick Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:17:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2008/07/11/what-freedom-of-speech-really-means/#comment-193271 So, what is your take on libel laws? So, what is your take on libel laws?

]]>