http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2009/03/10/there-was-never-a-ban-on-stem-cell-research/ Specializing in Bovine Fecal Detection Since January of 2002 Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:29:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2009/03/10/there-was-never-a-ban-on-stem-cell-research/#comment-120887 Vinny Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:51:22 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2009/03/10/there-was-never-a-ban-on-stem-cell-research/#comment-120887 Definitely sarcasm ;-) Definitely sarcasm

]]> http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2009/03/10/there-was-never-a-ban-on-stem-cell-research/#comment-193485 Vinny Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:51:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2009/03/10/there-was-never-a-ban-on-stem-cell-research/#comment-193485 Definitely sarcasm ;-) Definitely sarcasm

]]> http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2009/03/10/there-was-never-a-ban-on-stem-cell-research/#comment-120886 Nathalie Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:50:52 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2009/03/10/there-was-never-a-ban-on-stem-cell-research/#comment-120886 Comment #1 is sarcasm, right?? The People's Republic of California has put billions into stem cell research (including the embryonic kind), so to say that there has been a federal ban is just plain WRONG. I personally voted against the proposition because schools and public safety come first, and California is a disaster of a state. http://www.cirm.ca.gov/ Comment #1 is sarcasm, right?? The People’s Republic of California has put billions into stem cell research (including the embryonic kind), so to say that there has been a federal ban is just plain WRONG. I personally voted against the proposition because schools and public safety come first, and California is a disaster of a state. http://www.cirm.ca.gov/

]]> http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2009/03/10/there-was-never-a-ban-on-stem-cell-research/#comment-193484 Nathalie Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:50:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2009/03/10/there-was-never-a-ban-on-stem-cell-research/#comment-193484 Comment #1 is sarcasm, right?? The People's Republic of California has put billions into stem cell research (including the embryonic kind), so to say that there has been a federal ban is just plain WRONG. I personally voted against the proposition because schools and public safety come first, and California is a disaster of a state. http://www.cirm.ca.gov/ Comment #1 is sarcasm, right?? The People’s Republic of California has put billions into stem cell research (including the embryonic kind), so to say that there has been a federal ban is just plain WRONG. I personally voted against the proposition because schools and public safety come first, and California is a disaster of a state. http://www.cirm.ca.gov/

]]> http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2009/03/10/there-was-never-a-ban-on-stem-cell-research/#comment-120885 Maxi New Aters Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:11:57 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2009/03/10/there-was-never-a-ban-on-stem-cell-research/#comment-120885 Don't you believe it! To limit taxpayer funds being sent to scientists is the same as sending those scientists to Buchenwald! Bush wanted to drown all the stem cell doctors! The American Taxpayer has no right to forbid the government from doing what's right in the name of science with their money. So it was a ban. You're wrong. All the private bourgeois capital, billions of it, going into embryonic stem cell research in the USA was completely prevented from reaching its full potential because of Bush's ban on taxpayer money being used for new embryos. Don’t you believe it! To limit taxpayer funds being sent to scientists is the same as sending those scientists to Buchenwald! Bush wanted to drown all the stem cell doctors! The American Taxpayer has no right to forbid the government from doing what’s right in the name of science with their money. So it was a ban. You’re wrong. All the private bourgeois capital, billions of it, going into embryonic stem cell research in the USA was completely prevented from reaching its full potential because of Bush’s ban on taxpayer money being used for new embryos.

]]> http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2009/03/10/there-was-never-a-ban-on-stem-cell-research/#comment-193483 Maxi New Aters Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:11:00 +0000 http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2009/03/10/there-was-never-a-ban-on-stem-cell-research/#comment-193483 Don't you believe it! To limit taxpayer funds being sent to scientists is the same as sending those scientists to Buchenwald! Bush wanted to drown all the stem cell doctors! The American Taxpayer has no right to forbid the government from doing what's right in the name of science with their money. So it was a ban. You're wrong. All the private bourgeois capital, billions of it, going into embryonic stem cell research in the USA was completely prevented from reaching its full potential because of Bush's ban on taxpayer money being used for new embryos. Don’t you believe it! To limit taxpayer funds being sent to scientists is the same as sending those scientists to Buchenwald! Bush wanted to drown all the stem cell doctors! The American Taxpayer has no right to forbid the government from doing what’s right in the name of science with their money. So it was a ban. You’re wrong. All the private bourgeois capital, billions of it, going into embryonic stem cell research in the USA was completely prevented from reaching its full potential because of Bush’s ban on taxpayer money being used for new embryos.

]]>