<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two Sentences = Disciplinary Action</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2009/03/18/two-sentences-disciplinary-action/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2009/03/18/two-sentences-disciplinary-action/</link>
	<description>Specializing in Bovine Fecal Detection Since January of 2002</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:29:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John C. Randolph</title>
		<link>http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2009/03/18/two-sentences-disciplinary-action/#comment-134451</link>
		<dc:creator>John C. Randolph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 02:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/?p=4983#comment-134451</guid>
		<description>What I got from your post  was an impression that you believed the unions&#039; purpose was to protect their members, and that you were angry with them for shirking that duty.  My point is that they have no such purpose, whatever their propaganda claims.

-jcr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I got from your post  was an impression that you believed the unions&#8217; purpose was to protect their members, and that you were angry with them for shirking that duty.  My point is that they have no such purpose, whatever their propaganda claims.</p>
<p>-jcr</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John C. Randolph</title>
		<link>http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2009/03/18/two-sentences-disciplinary-action/#comment-193498</link>
		<dc:creator>John C. Randolph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 02:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/?p=4983#comment-193498</guid>
		<description>What I got from your post  was an impression that you believed the unions&#039; purpose was to protect their members, and that you were angry with them for shirking that duty.  My point is that they have no such purpose, whatever their propaganda claims.

-jcr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I got from your post  was an impression that you believed the unions&#8217; purpose was to protect their members, and that you were angry with them for shirking that duty.  My point is that they have no such purpose, whatever their propaganda claims.</p>
<p>-jcr</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinny</title>
		<link>http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2009/03/18/two-sentences-disciplinary-action/#comment-134344</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 14:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/?p=4983#comment-134344</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m laboring under that belief?  Did you even read what I wrote?  I believe I pretty much pointed out that they weren&#039;t in fact there to protect members.  For further reference, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2009/03/14/why-i-dont-believe-in-unions/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;read this to see my belief on unions&lt;/a&gt;.

By the way:  nice use of a pun.  Laboring under the belief.  You&#039;re a real card.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m laboring under that belief?  Did you even read what I wrote?  I believe I pretty much pointed out that they weren&#8217;t in fact there to protect members.  For further reference, <a href="http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2009/03/14/why-i-dont-believe-in-unions/" rel="nofollow">read this to see my belief on unions</a>.</p>
<p>By the way:  nice use of a pun.  Laboring under the belief.  You&#8217;re a real card.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinny</title>
		<link>http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2009/03/18/two-sentences-disciplinary-action/#comment-193497</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 14:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/?p=4983#comment-193497</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m laboring under that belief?  Did you even read what I wrote?  I believe I pretty much pointed out that they weren&#039;t in fact there to protect members.  For further reference, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2009/03/14/why-i-dont-believe-in-unions/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;read this to see my belief on unions&lt;/a&gt;.

By the way:  nice use of a pun.  Laboring under the belief.  You&#039;re a real card.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m laboring under that belief?  Did you even read what I wrote?  I believe I pretty much pointed out that they weren&#8217;t in fact there to protect members.  For further reference, <a href="http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2009/03/14/why-i-dont-believe-in-unions/" rel="nofollow">read this to see my belief on unions</a>.</p>
<p>By the way:  nice use of a pun.  Laboring under the belief.  You&#8217;re a real card.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John C. Randolph</title>
		<link>http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2009/03/18/two-sentences-disciplinary-action/#comment-134335</link>
		<dc:creator>John C. Randolph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 13:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/?p=4983#comment-134335</guid>
		<description>You seem to be laboring under an outdated belief, that unions exist to protect their members.  This hasn&#039;t been the case for many decades; basically since the mob first discovered that union funds were easy to plunder by placing low-level thugs in union leadership roles.

-jcr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You seem to be laboring under an outdated belief, that unions exist to protect their members.  This hasn&#8217;t been the case for many decades; basically since the mob first discovered that union funds were easy to plunder by placing low-level thugs in union leadership roles.</p>
<p>-jcr</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John C. Randolph</title>
		<link>http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2009/03/18/two-sentences-disciplinary-action/#comment-193496</link>
		<dc:creator>John C. Randolph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 13:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/?p=4983#comment-193496</guid>
		<description>You seem to be laboring under an outdated belief, that unions exist to protect their members.  This hasn&#039;t been the case for many decades; basically since the mob first discovered that union funds were easy to plunder by placing low-level thugs in union leadership roles.

-jcr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You seem to be laboring under an outdated belief, that unions exist to protect their members.  This hasn&#8217;t been the case for many decades; basically since the mob first discovered that union funds were easy to plunder by placing low-level thugs in union leadership roles.</p>
<p>-jcr</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinny</title>
		<link>http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2009/03/18/two-sentences-disciplinary-action/#comment-121834</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/?p=4983#comment-121834</guid>
		<description>The truth is they can still do a lot of damage as far as pension and continuing benefits go, so I wouldn&#039;t take the chance either.  Like I said, hopefully the damn union stands up for her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The truth is they can still do a lot of damage as far as pension and continuing benefits go, so I wouldn&#8217;t take the chance either.  Like I said, hopefully the damn union stands up for her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinny</title>
		<link>http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2009/03/18/two-sentences-disciplinary-action/#comment-193495</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/?p=4983#comment-193495</guid>
		<description>The truth is they can still do a lot of damage as far as pension and continuing benefits go, so I wouldn&#039;t take the chance either.  Like I said, hopefully the damn union stands up for her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The truth is they can still do a lot of damage as far as pension and continuing benefits go, so I wouldn&#8217;t take the chance either.  Like I said, hopefully the damn union stands up for her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2009/03/18/two-sentences-disciplinary-action/#comment-121833</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/?p=4983#comment-121833</guid>
		<description>Ok im a little confused here.  

1) They let her go (fired)
2) She said three words to a reporter
3) The same people who fired her called her back and disiplined her.

This seems a little backwards to me.  How can they disicpline someone who no longer works for them.  Am I misreading this story?  If my boss fired me then called me in to write me up I would tell him get fucked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok im a little confused here.  </p>
<p>1) They let her go (fired)<br />
2) She said three words to a reporter<br />
3) The same people who fired her called her back and disiplined her.</p>
<p>This seems a little backwards to me.  How can they disicpline someone who no longer works for them.  Am I misreading this story?  If my boss fired me then called me in to write me up I would tell him get fucked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/2009/03/18/two-sentences-disciplinary-action/#comment-193494</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insignificantthoughts.com/?p=4983#comment-193494</guid>
		<description>Ok im a little confused here.  

1) They let her go (fired)
2) She said three words to a reporter
3) The same people who fired her called her back and disiplined her.

This seems a little backwards to me.  How can they disicpline someone who no longer works for them.  Am I misreading this story?  If my boss fired me then called me in to write me up I would tell him get fucked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok im a little confused here.  </p>
<p>1) They let her go (fired)<br />
2) She said three words to a reporter<br />
3) The same people who fired her called her back and disiplined her.</p>
<p>This seems a little backwards to me.  How can they disicpline someone who no longer works for them.  Am I misreading this story?  If my boss fired me then called me in to write me up I would tell him get fucked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

