You might be surprised to know that I agree with you on the Obama/Fox News issue. He, or any elected official, has no business attacking the press like that (and I do think Bush called out The New York Times at one point, though I can’t find the quote).

You might be surprised to know that I agree with you on the Obama/Fox News issue. He, or any elected official, has no business attacking the press like that (and I do think Bush called out The New York Times at one point, though I can’t find the quote).

I have no problem talking issues with anyone, and I do it quite regularly here, on Twitter, on Facebook, in my videos, and elsewhere. In fact, I challenge anyone to talk issues for as long as I have. I’ve been doing this since 2002 and have never backed down from an issue or a discussion on anything.

As for “conservative critics of media bias,” I’ll only say one thing. Obama singled out Fox News. That speaks volumes. I don’t recall any prior President singling out a news organization for ostracizing in such a manner.

If that’s some kind of perceived right wing oppression complex in your mind, then so be it; I won’t change your mind, but don’t pretend discussing it is the avoidance of some greater issue. In fact, who would you rather have discussing media bias?

A blogger who doesn’t have any hand in public policy?

Or the President of the United States who can’t seem to find the time to make a decision on troop deployment in an active war who’s used the “time” excuse to explain away numerous things he hasn’t bothered doing?

Deflection, indeed.

I have no problem talking issues with anyone, and I do it quite regularly here, on Twitter, on Facebook, in my videos, and elsewhere. In fact, I challenge anyone to talk issues for as long as I have. I’ve been doing this since 2002 and have never backed down from an issue or a discussion on anything.

As for “conservative critics of media bias,” I’ll only say one thing. Obama singled out Fox News. That speaks volumes. I don’t recall any prior President singling out a news organization for ostracizing in such a manner.

If that’s some kind of perceived right wing oppression complex in your mind, then so be it; I won’t change your mind, but don’t pretend discussing it is the avoidance of some greater issue. In fact, who would you rather have discussing media bias?

A blogger who doesn’t have any hand in public policy?

Or the President of the United States who can’t seem to find the time to make a decision on troop deployment in an active war who’s used the “time” excuse to explain away numerous things he hasn’t bothered doing?

Deflection, indeed.

Goldberg seems to have made a career out of media criticism so I don’t think he’s doing the same thing.

Goldberg seems to have made a career out of media criticism so I don’t think he’s doing the same thing.

You know, if MSNBC were the ONLY biased network in that direction (kinda like Fox is to the right), that might be a valid criticism, but since MSNBC, CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN and the mack-Daddy of them all, the NEW YORK TIMES are all swimming around the tank with SCUBA gear on for Obama, I think the criticism that there IS bias has little to do with what that bias IS.

You know, if MSNBC were the ONLY biased network in that direction (kinda like Fox is to the right), that might be a valid criticism, but since MSNBC, CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN and the mack-Daddy of them all, the NEW YORK TIMES are all swimming around the tank with SCUBA gear on for Obama, I think the criticism that there IS bias has little to do with what that bias IS.

That sums up conservative critics of media bias in my opinion.

That sums up conservative critics of media bias in my opinion.