Berkeley, ne’er a bastion of non-progressive thought has a project called BEST, the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperatures project, and that project monitors and collates data on the surface temperatures of the planet.
Here, my friends, is the most important graph you will see all day.
Those are surface temperature readings for the past 10 years. No smoothing. No manipulation. No hiding of declines. Nothing removed for the sake of removing statistical anomalies, just raw data plotted out.
Do you see an increase in temperature there?
Of course you don’t, but then again, you probably aren’t in the global warming industry.
And in spite of that data, which clearly indicates there is no upward trend in temperatures, and that despite the claims that temperatures have been rising consistently for the past six decades, the past decade has been free of any rise in temperature, we will still have to watch the global warming industry deny the veracity of this report.
They always tell you the numbers don’t lie.
Surely they don’t; but the people presenting them? Well they lie. And when they don’t lie, they just ignore and obscure.
The truth is out there. Global warming is bullshit. If you don’t think it is, then ask yourself a simple question: why did they stop calling it “global warming” and start calling it “climate change?” It’s so that everything that happens validates their point. Hot summer? Climate change. Cold summer? Climate change. Rainy spring? Climate change. Dry spring? Climate change. Heavy hurricane season? Climate change. No hurricanes? Climate change. Blizzard? Climate change. Mild winter? Climate change.
Ask yourself this simple question, and ask it at any of your global warming acolyte friends.
If global warming is a scientifically valid theory, what falsifies that theory? In other words, if what proves it does in fact prove it, does the opposite disprove it?
If I have a theory that you can jump into a pool and not get wet, and you say that’s ridiculous, you can easily prove me wrong by jumping into a pool and coming out soaking wet. If you come out wet, then my theory can be proven wrong. It’s a valid theory.
You cannot have a theory that cannot be disproven. If it’s not falsifiable, it’s not science.
You can’t say every weather activity is proof of global warming when you claim that it all is on all extremes. A hot summer and a cold summer can’t both be proof of the same theory. Logic dictates that if one proves it, the other disproves it.
And that, my friends, is why you see a consistent and continuous effort to hide data that doesn’t follow along with their assertions. And it’s not just because they have academic credibility to lose, it’s because there’s a lot of money in the global warming industry to be lost if its proven to be the bullshit it really is.