To wit, we have this video of the peaceful protesters chanting about Khaibar… More on that in a second… Video first…

So what is Khaibar?

Khaibar is where the last battle to remove the Jews from Arab land happened.

But hey, this guys are all about peace. It must be true. The lazy media says so! After all, arranging a flotilla of ships to ram a blockade is a totally peaceful act.

In the most profound financial change in recent Middle East history, Gulf Arabs are planning – along with China, Russia, Japan and France – to end dollar dealings for oil, moving instead to a basket of currencies including the Japanese yen and Chinese yuan, the euro, gold and a new, unified currency planned for nations in the Gulf Co-operation Council, including Saudi Arabia, Abu Dhabi, Kuwait and Qatar.

Secret meetings have already been held by finance ministers and central bank governors in Russia, China, Japan and Brazil to work on the scheme, which will mean that oil will no longer be priced in dollars.

The plans, confirmed to The Independent by both Gulf Arab and Chinese banking sources in Hong Kong, may help to explain the sudden rise in gold prices, but it also augurs an extraordinary transition from dollar markets within nine years.

Source

After the verdict was read in the Cairo courtroom, Nabih al-Wahsh, an Egyptian attorney, jumped for joy and received an avalanche of telephone calls from friends congratulating him on his latest legal victory.

Al-Wahsh has managed to extract a ruling from Egypt’s Administrative Court — which rules in disputes between citizens and the state — that would force the Egyptian government to strip Egyptians married to Israelis of their Egyptian citizenship. The May 19 ruling was met with the cheers of millions in this populous Arab country.

“This is an historic ruling,” al-Wahsh said to reporters after the ruling. “Egyptians married to Israelis are dangerous to Egypt’s national security, acting in ways that contradict the constitution of their country and Islamic laws,” he said.

Calls flooded into TV talk shows discussing the verdict and readers posted comments on Web sites of newspapers that wrote about it.

Everyone appeared united in elation at the ruling, as well as in hatred of the Jewish state and everything that related to it, even if it was originally Egyptian.

“Israel clamors to become an integral part of the Arab world and to do so it lures Egyptians to get married to its women,” one reader wrote to a local newspaper, commenting on the ruling.

Nothing but paranoid hatred from the Arab world. So deep is the hatred that the Palestinians accused Israel of sicking rats on their country to torment them. So deep is the hatred that the Palestinians elected Hamas, a known terrorist organization, to run their country. So deep is their hatred that no matter how much aid the Palestinian Government gets, there has not been one new school, hospital, roads or courthouses (more on that tomorrow) in 16 years and so deep is the hatred for Israel that the Palestinian Government keeps its people in refugee camps (instead of building homes for them) to foment the hatred they need and to use them as pawn in their “oppression” and terrorism regime.

So while our President asks Israel to sacrifice more and give up more and fight less, he ignores the insane amount of hatred that’s been the real barricade to peace since day one. That’s what you get when you elect a guy who’s got no foreign policy experience, no international relations knowledge, and no media to point it out to the rest of the country. You get a President who strives to make all sides in an argument equal when it just isn’t so.

Maybe instead of asking Israel to sacrifice yet again it’s time to tell the Arab world enough is enough with the scapegoating of Israel for all their problems. If those words came out of a President’s mouth ever, that would be truly historic.

Not Hamas Headquarters.

A building of enlightenment and education.

[flv:nablus.flv 540 414]

The Al-Jazeera satellite television station recently broadcast footage of Obama on holiday in Hawaii, wearing shorts and playing golf, juxtaposed with scenes of bloodshed and mayhem in Gaza. Its report criticising “the deafening silence from the Obama team” suggested Obama is losing a battle of perceptions among Muslims that he may not realise has even begun.

“People recall his campaign slogan of change and hoped that it would apply to the Palestinian situation,” Jordanian analyst Labib Kamhawi told Liz Sly of the Chicago Tribune. “So they look at his silence as a negative sign. They think he is condoning what happened in Gaza because he’s not expressing any opinion.”

Regional critics claim Obama is happy to break his pre-inauguration “no comment” rule on international issues when it suits him. They note his swift condemnation of November’s terrorist attacks in Mumbai. Obama has also made frequent policy statements on mitigating the impact of the global credit crunch.

Obama’s absence from the fray is also allowing hostile voices to exploit the vacuum. “It would appear that the president-elect has no intention of getting involved in the Gaza crisis,” Iran’s Resalat newspaper commented sourly. “His stances and viewpoints suggest he will follow the path taken by previous American presidents… Obama, too, will pursue policies that support the Zionist aggressions.”

Whether Obama, when he does eventually engage, can successfully elucidate an Israel-Palestine policy that is substantively different from that of Bush-Cheney is wholly uncertain at present.

It’s something he’s going to have to deal with sooner or later; it’s just a shame it’ll now appear as if he was shamed into doing so.

As Barack Obama was running for President, many of us wondered how he would deal with Israel. Typically, very few Democrats ever take strong positions on Israel and Israel defending themselves unless they’re from a predominantly Jewish area (for example, Chuck Schumer and Hillary Clinton, for the most part, are very much pro Israel). The question marks come when you’re from an area that’s very left-leaning and not as much Jewish.

In Barack Obama’s weekly address this week, we got our answer, whether he wanted to give it to us or not. His address to the nation (because, as you know, it’s important for a man who holds no office yet to tell you what he thinks) this week did not mention Israel. Not one time. Not at all. Not even in passing. In fact, since Change.gov launched, Israel has only been mentioned once, and then only in the concept of a general foreign policy outline.

I’m not saying he needs to layout his entire plan, or that he even has to come charging onto the camera and call for Hamas to be destroyed. What bothers me most, however, is that this conflict has been going on forever, and over the past month has escalated. Originally, it was Hamas and their lackeys firing rockets into Southern Israel, hundreds at a time, for a few weeks. Eventually Israel started striking back, and it escalated this weekend with Israel sending ground troops into Gaza.

Despite this escalation, Barack Obama has chosen to make the topic of this week’s address the economy.

Doesn’t that seem odd to anyone?

Now you may say that his video is pre-done. That’s fine. This conflict isn’t new and he hasn’t addressed it yet. President-elect Obama doesn’t seem to have an opinion on the issue in any way. In fact, the AP noticed it and contacted the Obama campaign to get some clarification.

As the clock ticks down to Barack Obama’s inauguration, the US president-elect has kept silent on the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict and its latest deadly turn in the Gaza Strip.

Obama transition officials have ventured little more than saying their boss is “monitoring” the situation in Gaza, where at least 460 people have been killed in eight days of air raids before a ground offensive began Saturday.

In the same period, Gaza militant rockets have killed four Israelis and wounded several dozen people.

“The president-elect is closely monitoring global events, including the situation in Gaza,” his national security spokeswoman Brooke Anderson said in a statement after the ground assault got underway.

But she offered no further comment on the violence in Gaza and used a phrase repeated often by Obama and his aides: “There is one president at a time and we intend to respect that.”

Oddly enough, the fact that there is only “one president at a time” has never kept the Obama “transition team” from discussing other issues such as the economy, the environment, and so on. 16 days from the inauguration, and this is the issue he’s decided to defer to the President on? I guess there wasn’t only one President back in July, when Barack Obama told the New York Times:

In a July interview with The New York Times, Obama said he did not think that “any country would find it acceptable to have missiles raining down on the heads of their citizens.

“If somebody was sending rockets into my house where my two daughters sleep at night, I’m going to do everything in my power to stop that,” he said. “And I would expect Israelis to do the same thing.”

As for talking with Hamas, Obama told the Times that it was “very hard to negotiate with a group that is not representative of a nation state, does not recognize your right to exist, has consistently used terror as a weapon, and is deeply influenced by other countries.”

It would be nice if our future President would stand by his words, but I don’t see it happening. He’ll just defer to W. until he’s in office and then make no decisions and defer to Congress. This is the guy you elected, America. President Hopeandchange.

Today was the most traumatic day of my life. I don’t even know where to start in explaining what I went through and how I felt, because I just don’t know the words to express the whirlwind of emotions I felt. I guess the best way to give a picture of what I went through is to go through my day as it happened and try to give some sort of idea as to what I experienced.

So I woke up early today for Hebrew classes, exhausted as usual but excited that we were meant to be going to the market today to practice our vocabulary. But before I left my boyfriend started throwing up and was so sick and vulnerable that I felt I couldn’t leave him, and for me it was more important to stay and look after him. I spoke to my leader and she said it wasn’t a problem. At 10.30 we were due to leave on another trip to somewhere called Sderot, which was a place I had heard of recently but knew very little about. I made the choice to stay with my boyfriend and take an unexcused absence rather than go on the trip. However my leader kept calling me and demanded that I come with and I went.

It was going to be a long journey and so to keep us occupied and entertained we had ‘Charlie and the Chocolate Factory’ playing on the TVs. We were laughing and smiling, shouting when the bus driver made it quieter, and generally doing as we do everyday. No one gave much thought to anything but the amazing look of wonderful chocolate on the screens above us. When we drew closer to our destination our teacher turned down the film (which we got VERY angry about) and said he needed to say a few things. He told us that the city we were visiting constantly has rockets, called ‘Quassam rockets’, directed at it. This is a fact most people knew and was indeed the reason we were visiting this city. He then went on to tell us that there had already been 10 rockets in the early hours of this morning and so it is unlikely that we should have any now. However, we must be aware and alert and that when a rocket is fired a siren sounds all over the city, at which point one has 15 seconds to seek shelter before the rocket lands. No one knows where the rockets will land so wherever you are you must take cover in case it is near where you are. He finished by telling us that we are not in danger and we should not worry. I was instantly taken aback as I had not expected this at all. I was still half asleep and worrying about whether my boyfriend was still throwing up all over the place and then I hear about all this. But I really didn’t give it as much thought as you’d expect. We all laughed a bit at the fact that we are apparently “not in danger” and yet we were told how serious it is for us to act and move quickly if we hear the siren. As awful as it sounds, you just don’t dwell on it at the time. You trust that you are safe and you can’t possibly imagine anything like that happening to yourself because it is simple not something that we are familiar with.

As we drove along I noticed that every bus stop is also a bomb shelter and that more shelters were located all over the town. There is no stretch of land where there is not a shelter; they were everywhere and this really mad me start to think about how normal it must be for these people to require bomb shelters in their daily lives.

We began our trip by visiting a police station where we saw hundreds of previously launched rockets that had been collected. Each was labelled with the date it was fired. Most are braded with different colours or symbols which indicate the organisation that was responsible for firing that particular rocket. It was strange and shocking, yet once again I was still able to think of other thing: to read a text I was sent, to think of how hungry I felt, to think about the blazing sun on my face and anything else that was going on around me. I was focused and listening, but I can’t pretend that what I was hearing was having a huge effect because it wasn’t really. Don’t get me wrong, it did make me think and bring to my attention things I never knew and was chocked to learn, but the feelings were minimal.

We then visited someone’s house that had been hit two months ago. The old lady is in a fragile state physically and was therefore incapable of running for cover in a bomb shelter, and so when she hears the siren, she has no choice but to stay put. For years she was fortunate enough to be safe where she was, but two months ago a rocket fell through her roof and destroyed her family’s house. Fortunately she is alive, although how that is appears to be a miracle. Her house is in shambles. The roof in on the floor; every room is turned upside down; all her possessions are destroyed, and yet she is still here. Her daughter was severely injured and hospitalised for days, but is also fortunately now well and safe. I saw the look of despair and loss in the old lady’s eyes and fell silent with sadness at what I was seeing. The family are currently living in a small apartment elsewhere but do not have the money to move nor repair their house. As I walked out the house, neighbours were asking us to witness the destruction to their homes too, but we were hurried onto the bus to leave. As we drove away I could see that her house was only one of many hit on her street alone. At this point the bus was quieter, everyone in thought about what we were seeing and how devastating it must be for them to live in such a way.
We then went to lunch in a shwarma place in the city. We were glad to be eating there as opposed to the normal packed lunches we receive on trips, and were told that the reason for this was to try to help the city out by buying their food. We were sitting together and eating away, laughing and chatting as usual. It was easy to go from a state of thought and sympathy for the people of the down, to the thoughts of my food and trying my best not to make a mess! I had finished up and was sitting watching a boy eat a white ice-cream, although I can’t now remember who the person was, when all of a sudden everyone was rushing and shouting and I was confused as to what was going on. Over all the chaos I heard my leader shout, “Everyone to the bomb shelter!!” The siren had sounded and we had 15 seconds to reach safety. I jumped up and grabbed my bag and ran for the door. As I did so my bag got caught on the chair and I actually took about 1 or 2 of those precious seconds to release my bag so that I would have it with me. Looking back it seems insane to have taken that time, or rather wasted that time to get my bag, but at that moment all I was thinking was that God forbid I get hurt or worse, then I want to be able to speak to the people I love. All that kept going through my head was if I would ever see my family and those I love again, would I tell them I love them, would I laugh and smile with them…..would I live? As I ran out of the building I just thought I was going to die; I was in open space and I just thought that was it. I ran with such panic across the road to the closest bomb shelter which was a small bus stop. I was one of the very last to reach the shelter and couldn’t quite manage to get in. after a few seconds of shouting and pushing I was under cover. My eyes began to tear slightly and I began to shake, but I was still confused and mixed up and overwhelmed by what was happening. Shortly after we were given the clear that we could leave the shelter. As I walked out I began to cry. We all hugged each other close, both those who we like and don’t like, whoever they were it didn’t matter, we were all together and we all had to be there for each other. I managed to get hold of my dad, but when he picked up the phone saying “hey sweetie how are you?”, I throat closed up and I began to sob so hard that no words could come out. I was finding it hard to breathe normally and could simply sob. I was shaking so hard that my whole body jerked. A friend of mine came up to me and put his arms around me, at which point I relaxed enough to explain to my dad what had happened. We then all sat together, comforting those around us, joining as a group and supporting one another. We were told that we would not be ending our trip and that we would continue the day. I understood that if our leaders had decided to take us home straight away it would not be a very good lesson or message, yet at that point all I wanted to do was go back to Jerusalem and feel safe again.

As we made our way to the coach and continued on our journey, I couldn’t not relax. I would sit still, then suddenly burst out in tears at any quick movement, I saw the bomb shelters in the road as we drove by and I pictured the moment I ran towards it for my life, and welled up once again. I couldn’t get the awful thoughts out of my head. What if I had died? What if I never saw my loved ones again or told them what they mean to me?? When we got off the bus again I heard the teacher telling another girl how lucky we were that the rocket was not near us. He said that we did not reach the shelter in nearly enough time and that had the rocket been where we were, half our class would have died. Half our class would have died. That would have been me too. I was one of the last three to reach the shelter, I could barely even get in once I got there, and so if the rocket had been near us, I would not be able to write about my experience now.

I couldn’t get these thoughts out my head. I could not relax or take anything else in. I just wanted to leave. A car alarm sounded behind a group of us girls and we all jumped, some of us bursting out crying in fear that it was another siren. My eyes would not dry out, every second I thought I could feel alright again, I would feel the fear and anxiety I felt as I ran for cover and I would begin to cry again.

We were visiting a building in the process of development which was being built with protection from rockets. Everyone went onto the roof to see the view and be taught about something, although I do not know what that something was because I couldn’t bare to go onto the roof in open space. I stayed downstairs with a group of other people discussing our feeling and how shocked we were that as educated Jews who visit Israel on a regular basis, we knew noting of this place or what people experience on a daily basis.

From there we went to the Sderot media centre to have a look at photos from previous attacks and hear about what exactly they do. When we walked in we began to write down our email addresses in order to receive regular updates on the situation in Sderot. As the second person began writing down their details, a lady ran in to the building to tell us it was a ‘Red Alert’. The siren ha just sounded again, another rocket had been launched. Our teacher shouted for us to run out to the bomb shelters but as we went to leave, we were told we did not have time to reach the shelters. One girl had already run outside towards the nearest shelter and was out in the open when she realised no one was with her and turned back towards the building. She was back with us in a matter of seconds. We were told to stay inside, to drop to the floor and stay as low as possible and if possible next to walls. I dropped to the floor and crunched into a ball and began to shake and sob harder than I ever knew I could. This time I really thought it was it. We were lucky the last time, even our teacher said that, we were still there because we were fortunate, but perhaps this time it would not be the case. I couldn’t catch my breath and I was shaken up with panic. The same thoughts went through my head, my mum, my dada, my siblings, my boyfriend, my friends; everyone I love and care about….. What if this is it? Moments later we were told to jump up and run to the shelters, at which point another rocket was launched and once again we would not reach the shelters in time. One person was shouting for us to leave, another was shouting for us to stay, what were we meant to do? And then a third siren, yet another rocket launched. My cries became deeper and harder and at this point I thought it would never end. This was all happening in a number of seconds, each rocket about 20 seconds apart, but as I was curled up on the floor rocking myself in my own arms it felt like forever. My usual concept of time was out the window. It was all such a rush and panic that it seemed too quick to comprehend, and yet it felt like I was sitting awaiting my destiny for hours.

As we sat crunched together we heard 2 of the 3 rockets land and explode somewhere. I don’t know how near or far away they were, but we could hear them land. After the third rocket, there was no sound of a further siren and so we knew we had time to make it to the shelter and so we ran across to safety. This time I was the first one out of the building and into the shelter. I cried and cried and shook with fear, yet felt relief that I was under the safety of the shelter. At that moment my step mum called me and I cried harder at the sound of a voice o someone I love. I was told to get off the phone however and so I stood alongside the people around me. We were so united and joined as one, it was amazing how much because can care for one another in such times. Some people ensured that their friends were out the building before they themselves ran for cover. Some didn’t appear shaken but rather acted as the supporters for those who were braking down. I myself ran for my life with no other thought other than my own safety in the hope that I would not be taken from the ones I love. Is that selfish? I don’t know, but it’s what I did and it’s how I reacted. I was so happy to be with the people around me and it made the experience more manageable, if it is possible to say that, by having companions with me, however when my thoughts were with the people I care about and I did all I could to protect myself for them.

A while after we were told that we would no be ending our trip and leaving straight away. It was not necessary to visit more of the town in order to understand what was happening there; we had seen it for ourselves. We made our way to the coach and left soon after. The tears did not stop the whole journey back. Towards the end they stopped rolling down my cheeks but my eyes did not dry up. When we arrived at our youth hostel in Jerusalem I was slightly more composed and could the tears had stopped. I went straight to see my boyfriend and as I saw his face I burst out crying once again and felt so unbelievably blessed at the fact that I could see him and was not taken from him. I sobbed into his arms and though I felt relieved to be safe, I could not get rid of the fear that had taken over me just hours before. Since I’ve been back in safety for the past four hours, I have been up and down. Every time I speak to a family member I can’t control myself and my emotions are thrown all over the place, but the bottom line is: I am so happy that I am speaking to them right now.

Today has been a whirlwind of emotions and it is something I will never ever forget. I have never been so scared in my entire life and have never actually considered the possibility of my life coming close to an end. The thought is not something that can be explained or described and I do not believe that anyone can understand what it feels like until you are in that position yourself. We all handled it in very different ways today and you could see a large variation of responses to the traumatic situation, and you can’t know how it is you would react until you experience it. I hope that you will never have to know what you would do, because it is simply the most horrible thing in the world to have to go through such a situation.

As I’ve been writing this I’ve managed to keep going the whole time just letting it out as it comes, but right now I stopped for a few moments, tearing up again, just thinking how lucky I am to be sitting here and how horrible today was.

I am lucky, but I can’t say the same for everyone who was in Sderot today. What about the innocent civilians that live there? What about the children that have to run out their classrooms numerous times a day? When I cried “I want to go home!”, what did they cry? They are home. That is their lives and they have no choice but to live it for as long as they can. Rockets have been launched over the border from Gaza for 7 years now, into Sderot and other nearby areas. In that times over 8000 rockets have been launched. My experience today, though complete out of the ordinary in my perspective, is part of the everyday lives if the people living there. When we were in the bomb shelter after the first rocket, an Israeli lady was making a fuss for us to let her out quickly because she was going to miss her buss. Someone responded that it is better for her to miss her bus than miss her life. For us it is crazy to even think of the importance of catching the next bus at such a time, but for people who live there and have had hundreds of rockets a month for seven years, they have no choice but to continue with their lives as normally as is possible. Yet they also have to live in a way that takes into account their situation. Families sleep in one room so that they are all together when sirens sound at night; people bare in mind the shoes and clothes they are wearing so that they are able to run when necessary; people take very quick showers and usually have someone standing near them who can tell them if the siren sounds; and so many other things become a routine in these people’s lives so that they can find a way to live in a town which does not know safety.

How is it that I never knew this was going on? How is it that it hasn’t been stopped in so many years? If this was happening in London…. well it just wouldn’t be, it would never continue like this, it would be stopped and we would all know about it. But we do not know about everything. As a person who has come to Israel over 20 times in my life, and who has learnt about Israel and who is interested in politics and current affairs, I never knew about this. I never knew until today, even after having been living in Israel for the past 7 months, I still never knew.

I don’t even know what else to say. I am still overwhelmed by what has gone on today, I can’t get rid of the feelings and emotions that I have felt, or the shock that something so horrific can be taking place for so long and yet barely anyone knows and barely anything is done. If I can ask one thing of you, please read my story and share it with others and perhaps if enough people become aware of the situation, changes can begin to take place. There is so much more that I don’t know about and my story really only gives you part of the picture.

(I apologise if some of this is jumbled or doesn’t make sense but at this stage I just had to get out what I felt and I can’t bare to read it over again so it is in front of you exactly as it came out when I wrote it.)

Katrina

One of two Palestinian suicide bombers from Gaza who apparently sneaked into Israel from the Egyptian Sinai blew himself up at a shopping center in this southern desert town on Monday. He killed an Israeli woman and wounded 11 people, medical officials said.

Israeli police at the scene of a suicide bombing in Dimona, Israel, on Monday.

It was the first suicide attack in Israel in more than a year.

The second bomber failed to detonate his explosive belt and was shot dead by a police officer, a police spokesman said.

Militant groups in Gaza made the names of the attackers public later on Monday, saying they had come from Gaza.

Over the previous 11 days, residents of Gaza were able to move in and out of Egypt with relative ease because of a temporary breach in the Gaza-Egypt border. The Egyptian military resealed the border on Sunday, and crowds began to gather at the crossing on Monday. One Palestinian was killed and 16 people were wounded, including Egyptian border guards, when the guards used tear gas and fired on the crowd, according to medical officials in Gaza.

Did you catch what I caught?

A breach in the border? Border “resealed?”

Doesn’t anyone see what’s going on here?

The Arab countries in the Middle East are desperate for us to feel the plight of the poor Palestinian people, yet when it comes time for the Palestinians to enter another Arabic country, they’re kept in refuge camps and segregated from the population. Instead of allowing the free movement between countries that they constantly demand of Israel, they seal their own borders and restrict entry.

Why?

Because the myth of Palestinian oppression only exists so long as the rich Arab nations surrounding Israel can keep fomenting hatred by not allowing Palestinians to move on from the areas they lay claim to. And the left in this country falls all over themselves to sympathize and continuously blame Israel for all the ills of the terrorist-controlled Palestinian territories.

In chess, we call them pawns.

TEHRAN (Reuters) – Iran’s president said on Sunday the Lebanese and the Palestinians had pressed a “countdown button” to bring an end to Israel.

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who triggered outrage in the West two years ago when he said Israel should be “wiped off the map”, has often referred to the destruction of the Jewish state but says Iran is not a threat.

“With God’s help, the countdown button for the destruction of the Zionist regime has been pushed by the hands of the children of Lebanon and Palestine,” Ahmadinejad said in a speech.

“By God’s will, we will witness the destruction of this regime in the near future,” he said. He did not elaborate.

Iran often praises the Palestinians for what it says is their resistance against Israeli occupation. Tehran also described the war last summer between Hezbollah in Lebanon and Israel as a victory for the Iranian-backed group.

“If you make a mistake and create another war against the oppressed Lebanese nation, this time the angry ocean of the nations of the region will remove your rotten … roots from the region,” the president said in another speech on Sunday night.

Nope. Wouldn’t want to have a war with these guys. They’re so grounded in reality. we don’t even know for sure if they even want a bomb, right?

RIGHT?

[tags]iaea, iran, israel[/tags]

First, let’s watch a clip of the debate. It won’t be hard to see the obvious lack of knowledge of international affairs on the part of America’s Mayor^tm…

“That’s really an extraordinary statement. As someone who lived through the attack of September 11, that we invited the attack because we were attacking Iraq. I don’t think I’ve ever heard that before and I’ve heard some pretty absurd explanations for September 11.”

Rudy, what the hell are you talking about? In six years you’ve never heard that explanation?

Jesus, as someone who lived through 9/11 (just like the rest of this city) I find that hard to believe, and I find it even harder to believe that the cheering schmucks in the audience believed it. I was bouncing through Reddit today and I saw a story on CNN that warranted a read, particularly for all the right wingers who sharpened their teeth and bit into Ron Paul…

Paul tried to explain the process known as “blowback” — which is the result of someone else’s action coming back to afflict you — but the audience drowned him out as the other candidates tried to pounce on him.

After watching all the network pundits laud Giuliani, it struck me that they must be the most clueless folks in the world.

First, Giuliani must be an idiot to not have heard Paul’s rationale before. That issue has been raised countless times in the last six years by any number of experts.

Second, when we finish with our emotional response, it would behoove us to actually think about what Paul said and make the effort to understand his rationale.

Granted, Americans were severely damaged by the hijacking of U.S. planes, and it has resulted in a worldwide fight against terror. Was it proper for the United States to respond to the attack? Of course! But should we, as a matter of policy, and moral decency, learn to think and comprehend that our actions in one part of the world could very well come back to hurt us, or, as Paul would say, blow back in our face? Absolutely. His real problem wasn’t his analysis, but how it came out of his mouth.

I would never try to justify what those scumbags did to people in those towers, in the Pentagon, and in Pennsylvania. That would be absolutely asinine. What’s even more asinine is the Mayor of New York City at the time never having heard that experts had included in their reasoning everything from Iraq to our support of Israel to the shows we watch on television.

That being said, Roland Martin is correct in one thing. Ron Paul’s problem was more one of delivery than one of facts, but of course in this age of sound-bite debating where the rules, conditions, and even questions are set forward before a candidate ever hits the stage, it comes as no surprise that style is more important than substance.

Our actions in Iraq in the early 90′s and even now don’t justify attacks on the US in the future, but they do potentially explain it. It’s called theory. You take the event, find any connected events, and draw together a theory. The theory that something we did may have been an instigator for 9/11, the truth of which is debatable, is not completely without any merit, and for the former Mayor to stand before a national television audience in a Presidential debate and dismiss it as “extraordinary” and “absurd” is laughable.

I look forward to future debates, so we can see what else Rudy finds absurd. For example saying you’re against the horrible act of abortion but giving money to Planned Parenthood and calling it “choice.”

And to the people that cheered what Rudy said and slammed Ron Paul… Did you look at the words, or did you look at their meaning, and if you did understand the meaning, how do you reconcile that with supporting Rudy?

[tags]roland martin, rudy giuliani, ron paul, elections, 2008[/tags]

This got me thinking again about my own opinions on the Palestinian problem. People like to say it’s unsolvable because it’s so “complicated.” But to me it really boils down to one question: If Israel did everything that was asked of it (short eliminating itself), would its enemies stop trying to annihilate it?

As a rational person, you might be tempted to imagine yourself in the shoes of the Palestinians and say “of course!” Unfortunately, you are not in charge of the Palestinians. Hammas is. And their stated policy is the elimination of Israel. As long as that’s their written objective, Israel’s only sensible policy is to keep them so weakened they can’t raise a proper army. And while I feel that collective punishment in disguise is grotesque, how do you ask Israel to stop acting sensibly? And while Israel is at it, they might as well pick up some real estate too. What’s the worst thing that could happen – the Palestinians will get mad?

I do have some issues with American funding of Israel. As some of you readers have noted, American funds for Israel are mostly used to buy American goods. So it amounts to a tax break for some American industries, which I oppose on principle. My view on that topic has nothing to do with Israel per se.

My sympathy in this situation is with the victims on both sides. Most of them happen to be Palestinian. But there’s a strong case to be made that supporting the annihilation of Israel on religious grounds and dying in the process is the functional equivalent of suicide by stupidity. It’s hard to take that side.

Amen.

[tags]scott adams, dilbert, jimmy carter, israel[/tags]

Every time anything said by Lebanon, the Lebanese Government, or Arab news outlets is subjected to independent verification, the claim falls flat on its face. Makes you wonder why the folks who look up when George Bush says the sky is blue won’t exhibit any kind of skepticism whatsoever no matter how outrageous the claim is. Thank God organizations like Honestreporting.com bring these kind of stories to us because our fine media tend to ignore it.

[tags]ard, israel, lebanon, propaganda[/tags]

[tags]honestreporting, media bias, israel, lebanon[/tags]

The Disproportionate People
by Yashiko Sagamori

During the first stage of Israel’s war against Hezbollah, when everybody agreed that the Israeli response to the new, deadly round of unprovoked Arab aggression was disproportionate, I suddenly realized that Jews, in every respect, are an extremely disproportionate nation. Although only one in 400 people on earth is Jewish, we exert so much influence on everything that’s happening on this planet that most people sincerely believe that we control the world through some imaginary, evil Zionist conspiracy.

We have been disproportionately overrepresented in practically every human endeavor, from the list of Nobel laureates, to the gas chambers of Auschwitz. Our contribution to the wellbeing of this planet has been grotesquely disproportionate, and even more disproportionate has been the hatred the planet pays us back with.

In recent days, months, and weeks, there have been a slew of cases when Jews were accused of murdering Arabs, who were in fact murdered by other Arabs. For example, does anyone still remember the Arab family that was killed in an explosion on a beach somewhere in Gaza? It happened just before the last round of war began in earnest. During the few days it took to prove beyond any doubt that the explosion was not caused by an Israeli artillery shell, mankind was enthusiastically mourning yet another batch of innocent civilian victims at the hands of those bloodthirsty Jews. As soon as it became clear that the explosion was caused by a mine left on a public beach by Arabs and, therefore, Israel was innocent of that particular murder, the planet promptly forgot both the incident and the victims.

Since that episode was anything but unique, it must be clear why Jews, rather than anyone else, killed Jesus. Even today, if someone managed to prove that Jesus was killed by Arabs (or North Koreans, or Cubans, or the KGB, or the Khmer Rouge, or the Hutu, or anybody at all except Jews, like, for example, the Romans), Christianity would end. Within a week, nobody would remember who Jesus was, no matter how many tables he had overturned at the Temple. Anybody can kill, but those (allegedly! allegedly!) killed by Jews automatically become martyrs, saints, and, in some rare cases, especially when the victim happens to be Jewish (you didn’t think Jesus was an Episcopalian or a Russian Orthodox, did you?), other people’s gods.

That’s disproportionate.

But let’s theorize a little. Let us imagine that, instead of trying to please anti-Semites, Jews decided to react proportionately to every offense. The worst Jew-haters, the most avid murderers of Jews in the modern world are Muslims. They outnumber Jews approximately 100 to 1.
Therefore, if we want to stick to the proportion, every time a Muslim hurts a Jew, we have to hurt 100 Muslims.

For example, when Arabs destroyed the Tomb of Joseph (October 2000) and murdered Rabbi Lieberman who was hoping to salvage some of the books that had been kept at the site, Jews should have destroyed 100 mosques of similar historical significance and murder 100 mullahs. That, in addition to taking the Tomb of Joseph back and making sure that no Arab could ever again approach within shooting distance.

In retaliation for the recent terrorist act in Seattle, we should have forced our way into 100 Muslim organizations in the United States, killed 100 Muslim women and injured 500 others, 300 of them critically.

How should Israel have responded to the murder of a Tali Hatuel, a pregnant Israeli woman, and her four daughters, Hila, Hadar, Roni, and Mirav? By putting to death 100 pregnant Arab women along with 400 of their cute little children.

When the cannibalistic mob in Ramallah literally tore apart two Israeli reservists, Vadim Norzhich and Yosef Avrahami (October 12, 2000), Israel sent a helicopter to bomb the police station where the murder took place.
As usual, the Israeli response was criticized as disproportionate, although the cowards in charge made sure that the building was empty at the time of the retaliation. What would be a proportionate response to that murder?
Round up 200 young Arab men from the area, tie them up, line them next to each other on the main street in Ramallah, and slowly roll a bulldozer over them. If you think that’s inhumane, give them some Novocain before you start the bulldozer.

Sounds terrifying? Relax, my dear readers, I am not really suggesting you do it. You are Jews. When you decide to take justice into your own hands, you write an anonymous letter to the proper authorities. I am suggesting something entirely different. I am saying that a truly proportionate response to Arab atrocities would have had an effect similar to that of the two atomic bombs dropped on Japan, minus the radiation. It would have forever ended the Arab war against Israel, and, therefore, that should have been the policy of the Israeli government since the day Arabs promised to destroy Israel. By the way, a few ? very few ? applications of that terribly bitter medicine would, in the long run, have saved many thousand of both Jewish and Arab lives, just like Hiroshima and Nagasaki saved an estimated one million American soldiers and up to three million Japanese civilians.

In response to my perfectly obvious reasoning, I am anticipating a small avalanche of e-mails calling me a Nazi and unfavorably comparing me to various VIPs of the Third Reich. Here’s what puzzles me: why do they never turn their righteous anger against those who openly work to make the next Holocaust happen? How terribly disproportionate of them!

And, speaking about the Holocaust that has already taken place, what do you think should have been a proportionate response to that?

[tags]the middle east, middle east, israel[/tags]

Annan angered Israeli officials when he told Channel 2 on Tuesday that “dismantling Hizbullah is not the direct mandate of the UN,” which could only help Lebanon disarm the organization. Annan upset officials further when he said that deploying international forces in Lebanon would take “weeks or months,” and not days as expected.

Israeli officials said the IDF would not complete its withdrawal from southern Lebanon until the international force was deployed – even if it took months – to prevent a vacuum in Lebanon that could endanger Israeli civilians. An official in the Prime Minister’s Office accused Annan of having an anti-Israel agenda.

“He has been one-sided,” the official said. “He tried to be even-handed in a situation that was clearly asymmetrical. When one side committed crimes against humanity and engaged in genocide and the other side defended itself, he cannot treat us in the same manner.”

Annan rejected charges of bias, saying, “I have been very hard on Hizbullah and condemned Hizbullah for what it has done. I have condemned Israel for what I consider excessive use of force but it doesn’t mean I am taking one side.”

As usual, the UN will do nothing to stop a terrorist organization, and instead will grant it legitimacy and say it’s doing something by “condemning” it. It shouldn’t come as a surprise because many have pretty much elevated Hezbollah to sovereign state status and have begun treating Israel and Hezbollah as equals while claiming how much it supposedly pains them to see innocent people dying on both sides.

None of this comes as any surprise to those of us who actually pay attention. The UN has passed hundreds of anti-Israel resolutions in the General Assembly, but could not bring itself to pass a resolution that declared suicide bombing a war crime.

I’d like some evidence of Annan being “hard” on Hezbollah, particularly in light of his refusal to destroy it. I just won’t hold my breath waiting for it.

[tags]israel, hezbollah, war, war crimes, hypocrites, united nations, un[/tags]

I see that Hisbollah has declared victory over Israel. They’re right, they did win. A terrorist organization has been legitimized by the international community, they successfully used terror to gain an objective, and they still haven’t returned the soldiers they kidnapped—which started the war.

The UN capitulated to terrorism and pressured Israel to capitulate as well.

What a bunch of happy horseshit.

Yep, I’d say that pretty much sums it up.

[tags]israel, lebanon[/tags]

Ever?

Via Expose the Left, we have one of the scariest things I’ve ever seen. My favorite part? The juxtaposition of the raw footage with the 60 Minutes talking head rambling on and on with footage he has to have seen at some point.

Oh, and of course there’s this recent debacle which resulted in a Reuters photo-doctorer photographer being dismissed.

If skepticism is so healthy, why isn’t the Arab media suggested to any? So far we’ve taken pretty much every word out of Lebanon as gospel. Why is an oppressive Arab regime in one country so much more worthy of trust than a government in our own country run by a clueless idiot or the only actual free Democracy in the Middle East?

Something tells me Mel Gibson has the answer…

“The Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world.”

Thanks for clearing that up, Mel.

[tags]israel, palestine, lebanon[/tags]

I have to say I’m enjoying doing this a lot more than I used to. No arguments, just some fun chats in the comments section about this that and the other. Today, I was reminded why I don’t do politics anymore. Oh sure, the whole thing didn’t happen today, but it kinda came to a head for me last night.

I was reading through my blogs in Bloglines, and I saw a post over on Stageleft. It was mostly an e-mail from a site claiming to be the “Angry Arab News Service” that contained a few pictures of children killed in the recent bombings of Lebanon by Israel. A tragedy on any level to any thinking person. Innocent people dying in a war is tragic, especially children.

So wrapped in that tragedy, what does the “Angry Arab News Service” have to enlighten us with?

A FEW MINUTES AGO , the Israeli asked the people of Al Bustan village in the south to evacuate their homes. I am afraid massacares will keep happening as long as Israeli actions are uncheked. Please help us if you can.

Of course the letter also claimed that the pictures would never be shown in the Western Media. Combine the two and you have an implication; that being that the Western media would ignore these pictures because they (suppress your laughter now) paint Israel in a bad light. After all, haven’t you seen the scores of dead body pictures out of Haifa and Safed, the two towns getting shelled by Hezbollah?

Stageleft, of course, posts this with the following:

I have no doubt that these pictures will not see press time – wouldn’t want to offend western society with images of collateral damage that used to be play with dolls in the back yard now would we?

Or with images from the other side, for that matter, huh?

As you saw from the post before this one, I was on Nightline on Friday. Despite my recent embargo on watching news on television in any form (frankly, my brain cells do a good job of dying on their own), I watched. The first segment was a 12 minute piece on the conflict between Hezbollah (and Lebanon, of course, who aren’t distancing themselves from them) and Israel. In it, we saw the following:

• Interviews with Lebanese men on the street
• Footage of missiles hitting a bridge outside of Beirut
• Lebanese news footage of an Israeli destroyer being blown up
• Pictures of demolished buildings in Beirut
• Crying mothers who lost their homes in Beirut
• The on-scene talking head telling us how hard it was to get by in Beirut
• A voiceover of that same talking head saying how devastating this was to Lebanon, which was finally a country returning to respectability

Thus ended the report.

That was the whole thing. That’s what passes for fair in the media these days.

I have no problems with the hard truths of war. It sucks. Innocent people die, and we should do as much as possible to prevent it from happening. Kids should never be playing in their backyard one minute and dead another. They should also never get blown up on a bus on their way to school, or shot at a Passover Seder.

The Middle East is a mess. Terrorists quite convincingly run Iran, Lebanon, Syria, and Gaza. Saudi Arabia shakes our hands and then makes terrorists who kill civilians rich.

On and on it goes and it probably isn’t going to end in my lifetime or my children’s lifetime.

Stageleft has obviously fallen for the “poor oppressed dark-skinned people” line. Of course, Stage claims it isn’t bias and he’d love to post both sides of the story in every newspaper around the world. I’d highly suggest he start with his own blog, but of course he’s powerless to post both sides there as evidenced by his utter refusal to do so. Instead, he posts something from the AANS and claims he’d love to post both sides.

Well dude, it ain’t that hard to try. That is, if you want to. Take a stab at it. Criticize someone shelling Israel without a but.

Stageleft and Nightline are two apples packed with the same worm, and that worm is the pretense of openmindedness and highminded righteous indignation. Somehow all that openmindedness manifests itself as sympathy for one side, and disdain for the other, and often in telling one side of the story.

My question to Stageleft, and any of the other mainstream media outlets constantly beating the “Israel massacre” drum is this…

Can you even bring yourself to be as fair as you claim you would be if you could?

My guess is no and I have plenty of evidence to back that up.

Here’s the challenge.

Just for once…

Prove me wrong.

Regular non-political posting resumes tomorrow.

[tags]stageleft, nightline, lebanon, israel, hezbollah[/tags]